How to interpret 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 = 6^3 ?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter josdavi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the equation 33 + 43 + 53 = 63, exploring its significance, potential connections to higher-dimensional objects, and its relation to known mathematical principles such as Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions discovering the equation 29 years ago and expresses uncertainty about its meaning, suggesting it might relate to 4-D objects.
  • Another participant speculates that Euler may have found a similar equation, though they are not certain.
  • A different participant notes that the equation has been known for a long time and draws a parallel to the Pythagorean theorem, indicating its relevance in three dimensions.
  • One participant suggests that the equation could be useful in formulas involving sums of cubes, such as x3 + y3 + z3.
  • A later reply provides a link to a website that discusses equations of a similar form, indicating interest in further exploration of such mathematical relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of familiarity and certainty regarding the equation's significance and its mathematical implications. No consensus is reached on its interpretation or connections to higher dimensions.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the equation's implications and its relation to higher-dimensional geometry remain unexamined. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps or definitions involved in the claims made.

josdavi
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I found a special equation about 29 years ago (with a FORTRAN Program) -
3**3 + 4**3 + 5**3 = 6**3

I was/am not a mathematician, not able to fully understand the meaning behind this equation, maybe someone can derive some useful ideas like Pythagoras' theorem.

Is this equation related to 4-D objects ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i think euler found the same thing (im not sure).
 
That equation has been known for a long time, it' simlair to 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 (which is very useful when using pythagoras' theorum) and the like, but in three dimensions.

Obviuosly it is useful in any formula that uses x^3 + y^3 + z^3
 
btw if you are interested in equations of that sort like this one:a1k+ a2k+ ... + amk = b1k+ b2k+ ... + bnk k-exponent n,m-indicators you have this website:http://euler.free.fr/index.htm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
232K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K