Is the Orion Trapezium Exploded from a Pre-Stellar Body?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter juan avellaneda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    orion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Orion Trapezium stars are part of the gravitationally bound core of the Orion cluster, contradicting earlier claims of their formation from a pre-stellar explosion. Recent studies indicate that these stars are moving radially, but this motion does not imply an explosive origin. Instead, they are currently in a phase of stellar formation within the cluster. The initial assertions found in older literature have been debunked by contemporary astronomical research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar formation processes
  • Familiarity with the Orion constellation and its components
  • Knowledge of astronomical proper motion concepts
  • Basic grasp of gravitational binding in star clusters
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings on the Orion cluster's formation
  • Explore papers on the proper motion of the Trapezium stars
  • Study the dynamics of gravitationally bound star systems
  • Investigate the lifecycle of massive stars in clusters
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in stellar formation and the dynamics of star clusters will benefit from this discussion.

juan avellaneda
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I remember have read in an old russian astronomy book that the stars of the "trapezium" are separating radially , as if in the past a giant explosion of a big body have created them, ¿ is this true ? ¿what is this "pre-stellar" body ?

jp
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you google on 'trapezium orion proper motion', you will find lots of interesting papers on the Orion cluster, the Trapezium stars, how they are seen to be moving, what their fates will be, etc.

In a nutshell, the Trapezium stars appear to be the massive central core of the newly forming 'Orion cluster', and appear to be gravitationally bound. Looks like that old russian book relied on observations which have subsequently been shown to be incorrect.


One interesting paper.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K