Electric field of a current-carrying wire?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric field generated by a square wire loop carrying a current in the x-y plane, specifically at the point (0,0,z) as a function of time. The context includes concepts from electromagnetism and special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the problem into simpler components and using superposition. There are mentions of Fourier Analysis and retarded potentials as potential approaches. Some participants express uncertainty about how to begin and question the assumptions involved in the analysis.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various approaches being suggested, including the use of Fourier series and the analysis of loop antennas. Participants are exploring different interpretations and methods without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to introduce retarded times and the importance of justifying assumptions in the analysis. Some participants express confusion about the integral calculations involved.

Jerbearrrrrr
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
Suppose there's a square wire loop in the x-y plane centred on the origin. There's a current I flowing in the loop for t>0 (nothing for t<0)
What's the electric field due to the entire loop at (0,0,z) as a function of time?

I have no idea how to approach this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jerbearrrrrr said:
I have no idea how to approach this.

Personally, I would approach this using Fourier Analysis. You are looking for the time domain response to a step function. Maxwell's equations tell you the time evolution of the system. Note that the system is linear because no media are specified.
 
Jerbearrrrrr said:
Suppose there's a square wire loop in the x-y plane centred on the origin. There's a current I flowing in the loop for t>0 (nothing for t<0)
What's the electric field due to the entire loop at (0,0,z) as a function of time?

I have no idea how to approach this.

Alright, the first thing to try to do is to break it down into a couple of simpler problems, then use superposition. Can you first write down the electric field from a single wire at a distance of z' from the center?
 
Jerbearrrrrr said:
Suppose there's a square wire loop in the x-y plane centred on the origin. There's a current I flowing in the loop for t>0 (nothing for t<0)
What's the electric field due to the entire loop at (0,0,z) as a function of time?

I have no idea how to approach this.

Alright, the first thing to try to do is to break it down into a couple of simpler problems, then use superposition. Can you first write down the electric field from a single wire at a distance of z' from the center?

If you are completely lost, start with writing down the magnetic fields at those points at t<0 (I know that one is easy but do it anyway to understand the point.) and t> 0. Once you have done that, the previous poster had suggested using a Fourier series. That is a good idea. Break down j ( a step function) into a Fourier series. so the dB/dt is better defined as a continuous function.
 
This is in the context of SR, so we need to introduce retarded times.
I don't remember the problem exactly, but the integral came out as something doable I think. I used:
[tex]A^a=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int d^3 x' \frac{ j^a (t',x')}{|x-x'|}[/tex]
t'=retarded time:
[tex]t ^2 -'t^2 = x^2 - x'^2[/tex]
Parameterize the wire, say, y from -l/2 to +l/2 for a segment length l.
[tex]A^a = C \int dy \frac {\theta(t-\sqrt(l^2/4 +y^2+z^2) I^a}{\sqrt{z^2 +l^2/4 + y^2}}[/tex]
Integrate by parts to get a delta function and you get something funny with delta functions but it's okay.
Assume I can work through the integrals and find B (i'll get some paper at some point). Dunno if that's right, but the vector calculus doesn't worry me as much as the justifying.

It says justify your answer carefully - are we toying with assumptions or anything. Or do you think it means be careful with the signs when adding up the contributions?

(this isn't homework, so don't be afraid to like 'spoil the ending', it's part of an exam that's already passed x.x but anyway)
Oh balls, just realized I crapped up the integral. Oh well. I had like 20 minutes and I wasn't in electrodynamics mode (The paper had everything from set theory to complex analysis) haha. sigh.
 
Last edited:
Jerbearrrrrr said:
This is in the context of SR, so we need to introduce retarded times.
.

It seems to me like you are on the right track here in the analysis with the use of retarded potentials.

The way that I would approach this problem would be to look up the analysis of loop antennas. I believe the square loop can be considered 4 short dipole antennas and superpostion can be used. Usually, antenna derivations are done for sinusoidal steady state conditions, so this is where the Fourier Analysis can come in.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K