| Thread Closed |
Determining the result of a BRV by successive probabalistic observations |
Share Thread |
| Jul2-10, 02:35 PM | #1 |
|
|
Determining the result of a BRV by successive probabalistic observations
[I have been struggling with this problem for weeks]
Suppose you are wondering about the outcome of a coin flip. You cannot observe the coin directly, but you have 3 tests you can perform to increase your confidence. Before you perform any tests, all you know is p(heads) = 0.5. Say the first test is to feel the surface of the coin. If it feels smooth, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|smooth) = 0.7. Say the second test is to run your finger nails across the surface. If you hear no scratching noise, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|no scratchy noise) = 0.8. Say the third test is to peak into the cup of your hands. If you see a slight glimmer in the darkness, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|slight glimmer) = 0.6. Also assume that each of these tests are independent. What other assumptions can you make that allow you to estimated p(heads | (smooth) & (no scratchy noise) & (slight glimmer))? |
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Determining the result of a BRV by successive probabalistic observations
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Successive Approximation for Pendulum | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| Successive Excited States | Advanced Physics Homework | 0 | ||
| successive matrix multiplication | Computing & Technology | 4 | ||
| successive dilution problems | Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework | 0 | ||
| Successive boosts | Special & General Relativity | 5 | ||