Determining the result of a BRV by successive probabalistic observations

by caswell
Tags: determining, observations, probabalistic, result, successive
caswell is offline
Jul2-10, 02:35 PM
P: 1
[I have been struggling with this problem for weeks]

Suppose you are wondering about the outcome of a coin flip. You cannot observe the coin directly, but you have 3 tests you can perform to increase your confidence.

Before you perform any tests, all you know is p(heads) = 0.5.

Say the first test is to feel the surface of the coin. If it feels smooth, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|smooth) = 0.7.

Say the second test is to run your finger nails across the surface. If you hear no scratching noise, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|no scratchy noise) = 0.8.

Say the third test is to peak into the cup of your hands. If you see a slight glimmer in the darkness, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|slight glimmer) = 0.6.

Also assume that each of these tests are independent.

What other assumptions can you make that allow you to estimated p(heads | (smooth) & (no scratchy noise) & (slight glimmer))?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Successive Approximation for Pendulum Advanced Physics Homework 0
Successive Excited States Advanced Physics Homework 0
successive matrix multiplication Computing & Technology 4
successive dilution problems Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 0
Successive boosts Special & General Relativity 5