Register to reply

Determining the result of a BRV by successive probabalistic observations

Share this thread:
Jul2-10, 02:35 PM
P: 1
[I have been struggling with this problem for weeks]

Suppose you are wondering about the outcome of a coin flip. You cannot observe the coin directly, but you have 3 tests you can perform to increase your confidence.

Before you perform any tests, all you know is p(heads) = 0.5.

Say the first test is to feel the surface of the coin. If it feels smooth, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|smooth) = 0.7.

Say the second test is to run your finger nails across the surface. If you hear no scratching noise, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|no scratchy noise) = 0.8.

Say the third test is to peak into the cup of your hands. If you see a slight glimmer in the darkness, then there is a greater chance the coin is heads, suppose p(heads|slight glimmer) = 0.6.

Also assume that each of these tests are independent.

What other assumptions can you make that allow you to estimated p(heads | (smooth) & (no scratchy noise) & (slight glimmer))?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on
New model helps explain how provisions promote or reduce wildlife disease
Stress can make hard-working mongooses less likely to help in the future
Grammatical habits in written English reveal linguistic features of non-native speakers' languages

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Successive Approximation for Pendulum Advanced Physics Homework 0
Successive Excited States Advanced Physics Homework 0
Successive matrix multiplication Computing & Technology 4
Successive dilution problems Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 0
Successive boosts Special & General Relativity 5