| Thread Closed |
Christoffel symbol manipulation |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Jul7-10, 08:10 PM | #1 |
|
|
Christoffel symbol manipulation
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
If the basic equation for the Christoffel symbol is [tex] \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} g^{lj} (\partial_k g_{ij} + \partial_i g_{jk} - \partial_j g_{ki}) [/tex] so if you bring multiply the first metric into that equation, won't that turn the first two derivatives into derivatives of a mixed metric [tex] \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_k g^{l}_{i} + \partial_i g^{l}_{k} - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki}) [/tex] and then, wouldn't the first two terms go to zero, since they're just the derivative of the kronecker delta, which is constant? If that's correct, why not express the symbol instead as [tex] \Gamma^l_{ki} = \frac{1}{2} ( - g^{lj} \partial_j g_{ki}) [/tex] |
| PhysOrg.com |
science news on PhysOrg.com >> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis >> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt >> Galaxy's Ring of Fire |
| Jul7-10, 09:50 PM | #2 |
Recognitions:
|
Because g^{lj}*partial_k(g_{ij}) is not generally equal to partial_k(g^{lj}*g_{ij})=0. The metric components are not generally constants. Use the product rule on the second expression.
|
| Jul11-10, 06:48 PM | #3 |
|
|
oh, jeez, of course. I feel silly now.
Thanks! |
| Thread Closed |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Christoffel symbol manipulation
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| components of Christoffel symbol | Advanced Physics Homework | 87 | ||
| derivation of the Christoffel symbol | Special & General Relativity | 1 | ||
| Definition of a Christoffel symbol | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| Derivation of Christoffel symbol | Special & General Relativity | 10 | ||
| Christoffel symbol as tensor | Differential Geometry | 20 | ||