Can a guided zeppelin be controlled in the case of wind?

  • Thread starter Thread starter niko2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and control mechanisms of a guided zeppelin, particularly in windy conditions. Participants explore various concepts related to airship technology, potential applications, and control systems, while also touching on broader ideas about floating platforms and launch systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Niko proposes constructing a guided zeppelin equipped with GPS for programmed navigation and seeks advice on controlling it in windy conditions.
  • One participant mentions existing projects on powered airships that operate at high altitudes to avoid wind, suggesting they could replace satellites.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of a high-altitude floating launch pad made from linked helium balloons, aimed at facilitating private vehicle launches and refueling.
  • A different viewpoint questions the practicality of floating platforms, suggesting they may not be worth it for most applications but acknowledges potential for sub-orbital tourism and micro-satellites.
  • One participant suggests that a control system with zero steady state tracking errors, possibly using a PD or PID controller, could address the windage problem for the zeppelin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and concepts, with no clear consensus on the best approach to controlling a guided zeppelin in windy conditions or the viability of floating platforms. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the capabilities of control systems and the operational environments of airships, which may not be fully explored or defined. The feasibility of the proposed floating launch pad and its applications remains uncertain.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in airship technology, control systems, aerospace engineering, and innovative launch methods may find this discussion relevant.

niko2000
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I study electrical engineering and I was thinking about some projects.
I was thinking about constructing a guided zeppelin.
I would also add a GPS so I could program its course.
I was thinking about the possible problems. I don't know how could it be controlled in the case of wind.
I don't have much experiences with such things, so it would be really helpful if anyone could give any advice, remind me of possible problems or comment this project.
Thank you.
Regards,
Niko
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Greetings !

There are often large baloons with surveilence and other equipement
tied to the ground and without propulsion. You can search the web
for future projects on powered airships currently in various stages of development by Lockheed, Israelis and others. These are large
airships which will rize to altitudes of about 20 km where the winds
are minimum, powered by solar panels with accumulators, with their
own propulsion and many possible target payloads. They can be
stationary or cruise to various locations. In many ways, they'll probably
replace settelites.

Live long and prosper.
 
High-altitude floating (re)launch pad

Hi Drag, thanks very much for the valuable info.

I have refined an idea I posted a while ago re a floating launch pad. This large platform might be made for example from linked/tiled (hexagonal?) helium balloons.

It would allow cheap private vehicles to rendezvous and refuel. These vehicles might be be just capable of reaching the platform, but on re-fuelling could perhaps then reach orbital velocity.

Fuel and components could be efficiently floated up in helium dirgibles (as could passengers and craft). Helium/Balloons could perhaps be returned carrying waste products/returning vehicles/passengers.

Also, larger vehicles could maybe be assembled at this (appropriate) height and launched from there.

Hope you like this idea, Drag :)

Anyone, if this idea is any good, if it helps us get out there quicker, can you possibly help achieve critical mass?

Thanks and regards
 
Greetings !

I appologize, since I don't know which thread it was so I don't
quite remember what the highlights were.

Anyway, a floating platform just saves you the air resistance,
it just doesn't seem to be worth it for most applications.
I do however like the ideas about sub-orbital tourists and
micro-settelites launched this way, if it's perfected further.

But, here's the good news - there are many many more ways
to get into space and stay there - so keep trying ! :smile:

Personally, I believe the next generation launch vehicle should
for a short flight. Taking off and climbing at maximum rate it will
achieve a velocity of at least Mach 2+ right along the equator
and an altitude at the least above 50,000 ft and higher. The main
body consisting of a rocket (probably two stages) will then detach
and fire up the rocket engines while the aircraft flies/glides back
to land. Rocket engines with as high Isp as possible must be used
to increase the target payload or alternatively the first stage will have
them new engines which also include an intake for atmospheric oxygen
(not Scramjet). Very advisable for the first stage rockets to be reusable,
coming down with parachutes. :shy:

I believe that currently this approach can be the most effective = cost
the least, aspecialy in the long term, which can really get us a lot
more into space. Of course, if NASA uses the "let's build a super-something
from incredible and unknown stuff that we'll invent on the way and
forget that someone's paying for it" approach instead of the "point A
to point B transfer with maximum safety and lowest price" approach,
then even the best ideas are doomed. :wink:

Live long and prosper.
 
I don't know about your floating platform idea, but I think I know how to fix the windage problem.

Just design your control system such that it has zero steady state tracking errors for constant disturbance forces. I would imagine a well designed PD or PID controller could work. See any good control systems text for specifics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K