New Reply

Astrophotography

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb19-09, 08:36 PM   #239
 
Mentor

Astrophotography


Thanks, guys.

Baywax, all CCD chips are single color, but those on normal cameras have a matrix of color filters on them and software to generate the color. I take separate exposures with separate color filters, then mix them with software to generate the color photo. This maximizes the resolution and color depth of the camera/photos.
 
Feb20-09, 09:13 AM   #240
 
Quote by russ_watters View Post
I have a new camera - a DMK, grayscale camera. Here's one of my first Saturn shots with it... My best yet.
Awesome shot russ! Almost a straight on view of the rings, which is kinda sad :( (everyone loves the rings! haha) but it really brings out the detail in the planet having them "out of the way".

But GREAT SHOT!

One of these days I'll learn how to take pictures like this...
 
Feb20-09, 12:58 PM   #241
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by russ_watters View Post
Thanks, guys.

Baywax, all CCD chips are single color, but those on normal cameras have a matrix of color filters on them and software to generate the color. I take separate exposures with separate color filters, then mix them with software to generate the color photo. This maximizes the resolution and color depth of the camera/photos.
Very cool russ. Is Saturn a challenge to photograph? I just wondered because Jupiter seems like a sure bet to shoot since its so bright these days. Can you get a good shot of Jupiter and its many moons? Has anything unusual been going with Jupiter after Shoemaker-Levi?
 
Feb20-09, 01:19 PM   #242
 
Mentor
Quote by baywax View Post
Very cool russ. Is Saturn a challenge to photograph?
All planets are a challenge to photograph because the resolution is limited primarily by how steady the atmosphere is - especially where I live. The atmosphere was perhaps the best I've ever seen it that night and it gets close to that maybe 10 nights a year. I take about ten thousand photos at a time via video (my camera is like an expensive webcam) and combine them with software designed to filter out atmospheric distortion to flesh-out the details. It takes some practice and some effort. My website has a tutorial showing what that process looks like: http://www.russsscope.net/staxtutorial.htm
I just wondered because Jupiter seems like a sure bet to shoot since its so bright these days. Can you get a good shot of Jupiter and its many moons?
Jupiter isn't out right now, it is almost directly behind the sun. You may be looking at Venus in the evening if you think you see Jupiter. Jupiter is bigger than Saturn so photos of it will naturally be higher resolution, but for the past few years, it has stayed lower in the sky for those in the northern hemisphere, making it tough to get good detail due to the atmosphere. When it comes around again this summer, I'll post my results.
Has anything unusual been going with Jupiter after Shoemaker-Levi?
No, it left scarring that dissipated in a few months. Amateurs did get a few photos, but that was before the explosion in amateur astrophotography (due to good, cheap cameras), so there weren't many.
 
Feb21-09, 12:45 PM   #243
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by russ_watters View Post
All planets are a challenge to photograph because the resolution is limited primarily by how steady the atmosphere is - especially where I live. The atmosphere was perhaps the best I've ever seen it that night and it gets close to that maybe 10 nights a year. I take about ten thousand photos at a time via video (my camera is like an expensive webcam) and combine them with software designed to filter out atmospheric distortion to flesh-out the details. It takes some practice and some effort. My website has a tutorial showing what that process looks like: http://www.russsscope.net/staxtutorial.htm Jupiter isn't out right now, it is almost directly behind the sun. You may be looking at Venus in the evening if you think you see Jupiter. Jupiter is bigger than Saturn so photos of it will naturally be higher resolution, but for the past few years, it has stayed lower in the sky for those in the northern hemisphere, making it tough to get good detail due to the atmosphere. When it comes around again this summer, I'll post my results. No, it left scarring that dissipated in a few months. Amateurs did get a few photos, but that was before the explosion in amateur astrophotography (due to good, cheap cameras), so there weren't many.
Thank you russ.

Venus...? that is so bright for Venus. Is it closer than usual? Maybe I'm seeing the International Space Station. Except it doesn't move. I'll have to check this out. I'm at the 49th parallel and this planet sets after the sun by about 3 hours. (Obviously not an astronomer eh?!)
 
Feb21-09, 12:50 PM   #244
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by baywax View Post
Thank you russ.

Venus...? that is so bright for Venus. Is it closer than usual? Maybe I'm seeing the International Space Station. Except it doesn't move. I'll have to check this out. I'm at the 49th parallel and this planet sets after the sun by about 3 hours. (Obviously not an astronomer eh?!)
Well Venus is the brightest object in the night sky, save the moon.
 
Feb21-09, 01:01 PM   #245
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Nabeshin View Post
Well Venus is the brightest object in the night sky, save the moon.
No way! So I've been pointing out Venus and calling in Jupiter!!!? I really thought Jupiter was brightest because of its' number of moons. What's up with Venus? Is this because its closer than Jupiter?
 
Feb21-09, 03:02 PM   #246
 
Mentor
Yes, Venus is about as big as earth, is pretty close right now, and is white. All that makes it very bright.
 
Feb27-09, 04:18 PM   #247
 
Hello guys.

I would just like to share with you my images & webstie.

Direct link to my images: http://picasaweb.google.com/BOBMerhebi

Website: www.astrobob.tk

I will be glad to read you comments or suggestions.

Thank you,
BOB
Attached Thumbnails
IMG_2281_sitelogo.jpg  
 
May21-09, 12:51 PM   #248
 
I just saw all the 16 pages full of these awesome pics and I am gonna do it again !
They are just great!

I hope I can get a good camera some day and take such great pics!
 
May25-09, 02:29 AM   #249
 
astrophotography is my hobby, i like to collect photos of space objects and thaks for useful links, I am kinda newbie at it
 
May26-09, 11:51 AM   #250
 
Hi all :D. I wanted to know - is it very expensive to take photos of planets in general? What would be the minimum cost (approx) required for a noob?
 
May29-09, 06:43 AM   #251
 
Hi all,

Does anybody knows how to attach a CANON EOS 1000D onto a MEADE APO 152/1370 telescope? The telescope has a 2'' focuser drawtube. Many thanks, TtM
 
May29-09, 03:31 PM   #252
 
Quote by quddusaliquddus View Post
Hi all :D. I wanted to know - is it very expensive to take photos of planets in general? What would be the minimum cost (approx) required for a noob?
Hey there,

No its NOT necessarily. I have been an amateur astrophotographer for about more than a year now. I got my first digi cam; a Canon G9, although its expensive but you can find other than this that you can use. My first astrophoto was using my Canon EOS 750QD which is around 10 years old & still new with me. I took photos of the Partial Solar Eclipse back in 2006 & then got the digi files from the studio & processed them on my pc.

You can aslo purchase a fully mechanical cam (that doesn't use a battery for the bulb setting, of course if you know how to use such cams althoug I don't recommend a beginner to start with those) for a very cheap price.

make sure to check out my work on my flickr account: www.astrobobalbum.tk & my website: www.astrobob.tk

if you need any help, plz dont hesitate to ask me. :)

hope I answered you
 
May29-09, 03:35 PM   #253
 
Quote by Telmerk,the Magician View Post
Hi all,

Does anybody knows how to attach a CANON EOS 1000D onto a MEADE APO 152/1370 telescope? The telescope has a 2'' focuser drawtube. Many thanks, TtM
How to ? Easy. You just need to search for a cam-telescope adapter. its called by some a telescope adapter & others call it a cam adapter.

you get either a kit or the parts individually. I personally recommend the kit. It consists or the adpater + a T-ring that fits you cam from one end & the telescope from another. You can get the T-ring of your choice when ordering. As you will need different T-Rings for Different Eyepiece sized (i.e.; 1.25" or a 2").

I hope i also answered you

you can stay updated on my website that I included in the previous post, as I will sometime soon add my equipment pictures to it.

Cheers :)
 
Jun1-09, 12:30 AM   #254
 
Mentor
Quote by quddusaliquddus View Post
Hi all :D. I wanted to know - is it very expensive to take photos of planets in general? What would be the minimum cost (approx) required for a noob?
People (like me) start out in astrophotography with a decent webcam and telescope. For a few hundred dollars, you can take pretty good pictures of the moon and planets.
 
Jun1-09, 11:32 PM   #255
 
Mentor
We had some rare good weather last week and I captured my first good deep space photo in a while. This is an edge-on spiral galaxy. It is about 5 hours total exposure.
Attached Thumbnails
NGC4565-LRGB-3a.jpg  
 
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Astrophotography
Thread Forum Replies
Astrophotography Question General Astronomy 9
My Astrophotography Site General Discussion 23
QuickCam Astrophotography General Astronomy 4
Afocal Astrophotography General Astronomy 3