Solve Quadratic Equation with Imaginary Terms: (3-i)^2(3+i)/2-i

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter soccerjayl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Standard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a quadratic equation involving imaginary terms and the process of polynomial division. Participants explore the standard form of complex numbers and the remainder theorem in polynomial division, with some expressing confusion and seeking clarification on these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help in writing the expression \((3-i)^2(3+i)/(2-i)\) in standard form, indicating uncertainty about how to achieve the form \(Ax + By + C\).
  • Another participant questions whether "standard form" refers to the format \(a + bi\), expressing a belief that the problem may not be as complex as initially thought.
  • A different participant suggests using polynomial long division to find the remainder of \(x^4-3x^2+5x-1\) divided by \(x^2-3\), but there is disagreement about the complexity of the problem.
  • Some participants argue about the appropriateness of providing links to resources versus directly solving the problem, with one asserting that the problem is standard and another insisting it is more advanced.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of mathematical problems being subjective, with participants noting that what is advanced for one may be basic for another.
  • One participant suggests expanding the numerator and using the complex conjugate to achieve the desired form, indicating a method for solving the initial problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the complexity of the polynomial division problem or the best approach to solving the quadratic equation. There are competing views on whether the problems are basic or advanced, and disagreements about the appropriateness of the responses given.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with polynomial division and complex numbers, leading to different interpretations of the problems at hand. There is also a lack of clarity regarding the definitions of "standard form" and the expectations for problem-solving in the forum.

soccerjayl
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Could not form a complete answer on this. Yes i know i need help with LaTeX printing, but please work with me for now:

Write in Standard Form.

(3-i)[tex]^2[/tex](3+i)
___________________
2-i


First i made the zeros part of the factorization, ie

(x-(3-i)[tex]^2[/tex])(x-(3+i)
________________________
(x-(2-i))

but I'm lost, how do i make the form Ax + By + C out of this??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Standard form" meaning "a+bi" ?
 
robphy said:
"Standard form" meaning "a+bi" ?

sorry...

i'm guessing it is...i was assuming it was a harder question than it really was?

by my calculations though, 14 + 2i is the correct answer, eh?
 
Another question i had trouble on...

Find the remainder:

[tex]x^4-3x^2+5x-1[/tex] divided by [tex]x^2-3[/tex]

The remainder theorem being if x-k is dividend
f(k)=remainder

considering there are two parts to [tex]x^2-3[/tex] (plus OR minus square root of 3), how do i go about doing the problem?
 
as much as i like viewing the basics of the problem, no thanks

do the problem

using long division, i get r= 5x-1 over x^2-3

are you going to agree, or are you going to give it more thought
 
I assumed since you asked for an approach on how to tackle the problem you didn't know or had forgotten about polynomial long divison and thought a link to an example might be usefull to you. My mistake I guess.

Since you appear to be hoping someone will do your work and check your answer, I'll pass.
 
Well if you weren't lazy, you'd see it wasnt an average problem...

Its no good having the basics when you need the higher level guides to harder problems...doh

but as you are still lazy in being unwilling to agree with me after I've shown my own answer, fine pass, but if i had wanted the basics, trust me, id have "google"d originally

so thanks for your help

*******
 
On the contrary, yours a basic problem of polynomial division. The link I provided quotes the division algorithm and provides a fine example immediately after. This example is exactly of the type of problem you are attempting to solve. After the example they even explain how you can check your answer. If you knew these basics as you claim, why did you ask how to approach the problem?

As for being lazy, I did provide you with a link and I did take the time to skim it and see that it was indeed very relevant to your problem. So yea, I took my own time to do this for you, but feel free to call me lazy. Note that my refusal to check your work came after your curt demand "do the problem". Think about that.
 
  • #10
It was not a curt demand. I was only telling you that if you did the problem, you would recognize that it was different. It wasn't a DO THE PROBLEM FOR ME! sorry for the misunderstanding. As far as the basics, maybe my advanced problems are your basics, who knows. But thanks for your help, i do appreciate it.
 
  • #11
I don't understand.

If you want to put it in the form, a + bi then why don't you just expand the numerator and multiply numerator and denominator by the denominators complex conjugate?
 
  • #12
how is making you do your own work being lazy on his/her part?

and that problem is pretty normal for polynomial division. this is a help forum, not a quick answer for kids who are in over their heads forum.
 
  • #13
no matter where you are in mathematics, your advanced is always someone else's basics.
 
  • #14
soccerjayl said:
It was not a curt demand. I was only telling you that if you did the problem, you would recognize that it was different.

Fair enough, but you should realize that your problem is not any different than any other polynomial division problem (I have done it btw). You were obviuosly capable of doing this division. Have a look at the link I gave and tell me if there's anything fundamentally different about your problem that isn't covered by the standard division algorithm (I mean this, you should be able to compare the problems if you think they're different).

By "basic" I meant "standard", not that it was easy from everyones viewpoint. Believe me, I had a professor once who proclaimed everything was easy, even if we were talking about some pretty complicated abstract algebra (it was a Galois theory course)...it's easy if you've done it before and taught it several times, but wasn't so easy for the student!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K