Solving Ellipse Question: x=f*Sin(wt+\theta), y=g*Sin(wt+\phi)

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkEternal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the parametric equations x=f*Sin(wt+θ) and y=g*Sin(wt+φ) represent an ellipse. Participants are exploring methods related to conic sections and transformations to understand the relationship between the given equations and the standard form of an ellipse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using rotation matrices and transformations to relate the given parametric equations to the standard form of an ellipse. Questions arise regarding the nature of transformations and the implications of specific parameters.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and alternative approaches, such as rewriting the equations and applying trigonometric identities. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to simplify the equations and clarify the transformation process.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations may not represent a standard upright ellipse unless certain conditions on the parameters are met. There is also mention of the complexity introduced by inverse trigonometric functions and the need to manipulate terms to reach a familiar form.

DarkEternal
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Ack, such a simple question, but I haven't worked with conic sections in years. Can anyone suggest an elegant way to show that

[tex]x=f*Sin(wt+\theta)[/tex]
[tex]y=g*Sin(wt+\phi)[/tex]

is an ellipse? I've tried using a rotation matrix on standard parametric ellipse equations and then solving for the angle of rotation and the axes sizes in terms of the variables but it seems messy. Then I tried getting it to fit the general equation but I'm not sure how that would work. However, a simpler method is eluding me. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some hints: This is not an upright ellipse like [itex]x^2/a^2+z^2/b^2=1[/itex], unless [itex]\phi-\theta=\pi/2[/itex]. But you can get it into that form by applying a transformation like z=y+kx, where k is a constant. By expanding the sines, find k in terms f, g, [itex]\phi[/itex] and [itex]\theta[/itex] (actually will depend only on [itex]\phi-\theta[/itex] and f/g), and you are there.
 
Can you clarify what you mean by a transformation of the form z=y+kx? what is y?
 
DarkEternal said:
Ack, such a simple question, but I haven't worked with conic sections in years. Can anyone suggest an elegant way to show that

[tex]x=f*Sin(wt+\theta)[/tex]
[tex]y=g*Sin(wt+\phi)[/tex]

is an ellipse? I've tried using a rotation matrix on standard parametric ellipse equations and then solving for the angle of rotation and the axes sizes in terms of the variables but it seems messy. Then I tried getting it to fit the general equation but I'm not sure how that would work. However, a simpler method is eluding me. Any help?

If you don't mind a little nonrigorous math you can try the following.

Rewriting your equations slightly:

[tex]x = A cos(\omega t + \alpha)[/tex]
[tex]y = B cos(\omega t + \beta)[/tex]

The second equation gives
[tex]\omega t = \cos ^{-1} \left(\frac {y}{B}\right) - \beta[/tex]

Substitute into the first equation:
[tex]x = A \cos( \cos ^{-1} \frac {y}{B} + \alpha - \beta)[/tex]

Use the addition formulas for cosine and the basic identities for the inverse trig function and the equation can be cast into the familiar elliptical form.
 
By familiar elliptical form, do you mean general form? I can't seem to get rid of that square root term from the inverse trig identity...
 
Rearrange terms to get the radical on one side of the equation then square both sides. The "general form" is [itex]ax^2+bxy+cy^2+d=0[/itex] and, depending on the signs and values of the various coefficients, will produce an ellipse, hyperbola or parabola.
 
I got it, but thanks for your replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K