Why Does My Integration by Parts Solution Differ from the Textbook's?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on resolving discrepancies in the solution to the integral \(\int^{\infty}_{2} {x^2 e^{-x} - 2xe^{-x}} \, dx\) using integration by parts. The user initially attempted the problem as a single integral but received a different answer than the textbook, which approximates 0.5. A participant advised breaking the integral into two separate integrals: one for \(x^2 e^{-x}\) and another for \(-2x e^{-x}\), and applying integration by parts to the first integral. This method leads to cancellation of terms and simplifies the evaluation at the limits of 2 and infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration by parts
  • Familiarity with improper integrals
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Basic calculus skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the method of integration by parts in calculus
  • Practice solving improper integrals, specifically involving exponential decay
  • Explore techniques for breaking down complex integrals into simpler components
  • Study the convergence of integrals and how to evaluate limits at infinity
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as anyone seeking to clarify their understanding of improper integrals and integration by parts.

bfd
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Ok so I was attempting to solve an integration by parts problem and somewhere along the line I got stuck. Here's the problem:

[tex]\int^{\infty}_{2} {x^2 e^{-x} - 2xe^{-x}[/tex]

After using integration by parts twice I came up with this:

[tex]2xe^{-x} - x^{2}e^{-x} + 2e^{-x} \vert^{\infty}_{2}[/tex]

But this differs greatly with what my book has to say. They came up with an answer around .5. Any ideas on this one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bfd,

Its hard to tell what you did without seeing the steps, but I got what your book got. (I assumed the dx went after the second term in the integral). Break the problem up into two integrals. One with x^2*exp(-x) as the integrand and the other with -2*x*exp(-x) as the integrand. Preform integration by parts on the first integral. This should give you two terms one of which cancels the second integral out. Then you have to evaluate the first term at the limits 2 and infinity. Again one term will be zero and that should leave you with an answer.

Regrads
 
Allday said:
Hi bfd,

Its hard to tell what you did without seeing the steps, but I got what your book got. (I assumed the dx went after the second term in the integral). Break the problem up into two integrals. One with x^2*exp(-x) as the integrand and the other with -2*x*exp(-x) as the integrand. Preform integration by parts on the first integral. This should give you two terms one of which cancels the second integral out. Then you have to evaluate the first term at the limits 2 and infinity. Again one term will be zero and that should leave you with an answer.

Regrads

Hi thanks for the reply. I wasn't sure you could break up the integral so I just took it all as one problem. I'm pretty rusty when it comes to calculus. I will try that
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K