Thread Closed

2nd RFD: sci.techniques.microscopy.scanning-probe (was: sci.techniques.scanning-probe)

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep12-04, 02:25 AM   #1
 

2nd RFD: sci.techniques.microscopy.scanning-probe (was: sci.techniques.scanning-probe)


<jabberwocky><div class="vbmenu_control"><a href="jabberwocky:;" onClick="newWindow=window.open('','usenetCode','toolbar=no,location=no, scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,status=no,width=650,height=400'); newWindow.document.write('<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Usenet ASCII</TITLE></HEAD><BODY topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 BGCOLOR=#F1F1F1><table border=0 width=625><td bgcolor=midnightblue><font color=#F1F1F1>This Usenet message\'s original ASCII form: </font></td></tr><tr><td width=449><br><br><font face=courier><UL><PRE>This is to alert readers of sci.physics.research that there have been some\nchanges to the previously announced Request for Discussion (RFD) on a\nproposal to create a new unmoderated Usenet discussion newsgroup for\nscanning probe microscopy.\n\nThe complete (revised) RFD can be found at either of the following\nlocations:\n\nhttp://www.uvv.org/cgi-bin/getmsg/3033\nhttp://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1094833433.14841%40isc.org\n\nAs stated in the RFD, discussion on the proposal is probably best done in\nthe Usenet newsgroup "news.groups" so as to reduce the amount of off-topic\nand generally disruptive discussions that could result on this newsgroup\n(the FollowUp-To header has been set accordingly).\n\nWe hope to see feedback from as many of you as can spare time to provide\nit.\n\nThank you for your time!\n\nProponent: Thom Borton &lt;borton@phys.ethz.ch&gt;\nProponent: Jim Logajan &lt;JamesL@Lugoj.com&gt;\nProponent: Gordon Vrdoljak &lt;gvrdolja@nature.berkeley.edu&gt;\n\n</UL></PRE></font></td></tr></table></BODY><HTML>');"> <IMG SRC=/images/buttons/ip.gif BORDER=0 ALIGN=CENTER ALT="View this Usenet post in original ASCII form">&nbsp;&nbsp;View this Usenet post in original ASCII form </a></div><P></jabberwocky>This is to alert readers of sci.physics.research that there have been some
changes to the previously announced Request for Discussion (RFD) on a
proposal to create a new unmoderated Usenet discussion newsgroup for
scanning probe microscopy.

The complete (revised) RFD can be found at either of the following
locations:

http://www.uvv.org/cgi-bin/getmsg/3033
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...4841%40isc.org

As stated in the RFD, discussion on the proposal is probably best done in
the Usenet newsgroup "news.groups" so as to reduce the amount of off-topic
and generally disruptive discussions that could result on this newsgroup
(the FollowUp-To header has been set accordingly).

We hope to see feedback from as many of you as can spare time to provide
it.

Thank you for your time!

Proponent: Thom Borton <borton@phys.ethz.ch>
Proponent: Jim Logajan <JamesL@Lugoj.com>
Proponent: Gordon Vrdoljak <gvrdolja@nature.berkeley.edu>

PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> A quantum simulator for magnetic materials
>> Atomic-scale investigations solve key puzzle of LED efficiency
>> Error sought & found: State-of-the-art measurement technique optimised
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: 2nd RFD: sci.techniques.microscopy.scanning-probe (was: sci.techniques.scanning-probe)
Thread Forum Replies
measuring pH probe potential and interfacing probe with uC Electrical Engineering 1
3-D Echo Scanning Introductory Physics Homework 0
2nd CFV: sci.techniques.microscopy.scanning-probe General Physics 0
CFV: sci.techniques.microscopy.scanning-probe General Physics 0
NOTICE: RFD: sci.techniques.scanning-probe General Physics 0