Is Harmonic Oscillation Independent of Gravity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of harmonic oscillation, specifically examining a mass attached to a spring and its motion under the influence of gravity. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating that harmonic oscillation is independent of gravitational acceleration (g).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate formulas and analyze forces to understand the relationship between harmonic motion and gravity. Some participants question the derivation of equations and the implications of including gravitational force in the analysis. Others suggest considering variable changes to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring various mathematical representations and questioning the assumptions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation of variables, which may help clarify the relationship between the forces and the motion described.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions and roles of forces in the context of harmonic motion, particularly how gravity interacts with the spring force. Participants are also navigating the complexities of differential equations related to the motion.

Dracovich
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Ok so this is propably borderline college :) But it is the first college course I'm in so don't bash me if this is too basic for this forum. (btw hi I'm new)

Well the question in the book is as follows:

"A mass m is attatched to the end of a helical spring (spring constant k) which hangs vertically from a fixed support. Show that the mass executes a simple harmonic motion with the T=2*pi*sqrt(m/k) about a point whose displacement below the unextende position of the spring is (m*g)/k".

So I'm suppose to show that the harmonic oscillation is independent of g, and I've been trying a couple of different things but not been very successful. Mostly been rewriting the formulas to see if anything comes to me. Thought perhaps i had something when i had x=(T^2*g)/(4*pi^2)=(mg)/k in which g goes out, but i don't really think that shows anything.

Plus i tried writing up the forces when the spring is fully extended (maximum of x) in each direction which gives F=mg+kx=0 and F=mg-kx=0 but that just basically gives me the same mg=-kx which was used to begin with to derive x=(mg)/k so I'm not seeing a whole lot of help in that either :/

So perhaps someone here could give me a hint as to what direction i should go in, it would be greatly appreciated :)

Btw this site looks awesome, and I'm a msg board addict, so I'm really excited about this place :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does this look familiar?
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + \frac {k}{m} x = -g[/tex]
 
Yeah i at least know the first part, although now i am a bit confused (i should've caught and asked about this in class). Since the textbook says:
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = a = -kx[/tex]
But isn't -kx suppose to give F not a ? And I'm assuming you took
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + kx= mg[/tex]
And got
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + \frac {k}{m} x = -g[/tex]
But I'm afraid i don't see how those two amount to the same, since
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + kx= 0[/tex]
but mg=F

I just hope i got all the latex correct o_O not very used to that
 
Oh wait i think i just got it. So you got

[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + kx = 0[/tex]

As the formula for simple harmonic oscillation, and then the resulting forces are mg+kx=0 which leads to what you just said. Although I'm afraid i don't see where that leads me :/
 
Let's back up. Newton's law of motion says force = mass times acceleration. In your situation the two forces are the spring force (Hooke's Law) and gravity. So
[tex]m \frac {d^2x}{dt^2} = -kx -mg[/tex]
The k here is the spring constant. Now divide both sides by m to get my previous equation.
[tex]\frac {d^2x}{dt^2} + \frac {k}{m} x = -g[/tex]
If the g weren't there, could you solve the equation? (Hint: It's a simple harmonic oscilator!) The presence of the constant g on the right side does alter the nature of the differential equation. For example, using the simple change of variables
[tex]y = x + \frac {mg}{k}[/tex]
gives
[tex]\frac {d^2y}{dt^2} + \frac {k}{m} y = 0[/tex]
This actually answers your original question!
 
Yup the solving without the g would be the same way that x(t) was derived through the first differential equation (Asin(wt+theta), and hence obviously the second equation. I'm with you up until you change the variables, i think i get it but I'm still a bit perplexed by it.

Buuut i wrote it all down and will look it over with my studygroup tomorrow, i know they were having problems as well but perhaps this will spark some good conversation which will help me understand a bit further. Thanks a bunch :)
 
Just replace x with
[tex]y - \frac {mg}{k}[/tex]
in the DE and remember that the second part is a constant!
 
Right'o :) Thx a bunch i really appreciate it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K