Thread Closed

Solve for x in terms of y (Quadratic formula)

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Sep12-10, 02:14 PM   #1
 

Solve for x in terms of y (Quadratic formula)


1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Use the quadratic formula to solve the equation for (a) x in terms of y and (b) y in terms of x.


2. Relevant equations
4x^2 - 4xy + 1 - y^2 = 0


3. The attempt at a solution
I am not really sure where to start at all. If I could just figure out the values for a, b, and c of the quadratic formula then the rest would be simple (for me). Do you take the values from the current equation like this?

a = 4, b = -4y, c = 1 - y^2

I feel as if I am over analyzing this problem. If anyone could point me to a start that would be greatly appreciated. There are no examples from my textbook that pertain to this exact type of problem.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> King Richard III found in 'untidy lozenge-shaped grave'
>> Google Drive sports new view and scan enhancements
>> Researcher admits mistakes in stem cell study
Sep12-10, 02:17 PM   #2

Community 2012
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Yes, you got it.
Sep12-10, 02:42 PM   #3
 
Thank you for the quick reply. I did run into one more issue with this problem. After plugging in the values into the quadratic formula, I run into this step:

(4y +– sqrt(32y^2 - 16)) / 8

There are numbers inside the sqrt that I could pull out: 32 and -16. My next planned step it to re-arrange the values inside the sqrt as follows:

1) sqrt(32y^2 - 16) = sqrt((16)(2y^2) - (1)(16))
2) (16) * sqrt(2y^2 - 1)

This doesn't seem right though. I keep looking for an example, definition, rule, or law to use in this scenario but can't seem to think of one.

EDIT: Actually, it seems right now that I factored correctly.

1) sqrt(32y^2 - 16) = sqrt((16)(2y^2 - 1))
2) (16) * sqrt(2y^2 - 1)

Then the whole formula will look something like this:

(4y +- 4 * sqrt(2y^2 - 1)) / 8

I can then reduce the fraction to (y +- sqrt(2y^2 - 1)) / 2

I think I've got it! This problem has been stopping me for a while now.
Sep20-10, 05:10 PM   #4
 

Solve for x in terms of y (Quadratic formula)


Correct! Now, you've solved half the problem (you've solved for x in terms of y) ... you still need to solve for y in terms of x
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Solve for x in terms of y (Quadratic formula)
Thread Forum Replies
How do you interpret quadratic terms in the gauge field in a Lagrangian? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Are all quadratic terms in gauge fields necessarily mass terms? Quantum Physics 0
Do you need to use the quadratic formula to solve for the unkown? Precalculus Mathematics Homework 6
Solve For B In Terms Of A Precalculus Mathematics Homework 10
could someone solve for s/p (or p/s) in terms of v? General Math 1