Some People believe in Censorship

  • Thread starter macm
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolved around a post that was locked due to violating posting guidelines and being considered "crackpot material." The person who moved the post and issued a warning was Janus, who was accused of censorship by the original poster. Janus clarified that the post was locked by either an admin or moderator due to issues raised by other users, and that he does not have the power to ban the original poster. The conversation also touched on the standards of the forum and the importance of presenting accepted physics rather than personal theories.
  • #1
macm
10
0
We were having a good discussion on a contriversial issue when the thread was arbitrarily locked. Monitor's privilege certainly but normoally reserved for some violation.

In this case Janus comes from another site where this topic was running and he doesn't like the topic since it raises questions about Relativity. I had no roblems with and even anticipated the topic would be moved, which it was but locking the topic and making threats.

That is a bit much. there was no name calling just healthy exploration of some contriversial issues.

But since Janus is BOSS man here he wants to flex some muscle. Fine but be it known to all this site is being censored.


*********************************************************
You have been warned for the post: Your Post. Your warning level is now: 7. This action was taken for the following reason: This ain't going to fly here.. Please reply back if you have a dispute. Janus
__________________
Janus
**********************************************************
NOTE: "your post" refers to the topic "Time Dilation Tests" in the Relativity section, which was subsequently moved but still being discussed.

Do I have a dispute. You bet but I will air it here. Stick your mighty pen in your ear Janus. If you can't answer my questions then perhaps you should return to school, not try to control the questions raised here.

Want to have me banned? Have at it, what is the purpose of being a member in a site where one cannot discuss politely any subject but is blocked by the personal whims of an idiot. You poor damn egotistical fool.

Bye All.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
And this public display earns you sympathy... how?
 
  • #3
FYI, I merely moved your post and issued the warning. The reason for the warning was twofold: For vilolating the posting guidlines (which you obviously read) and for posting Crackpot material. As far as the Crackpot material part goes, I calls them as I sees them.

Your post was locked by either the Admin or one of the moderators of the forum to which I moved it. Obviously someone else had issues with it, as did the person who reported your post to me.

As far as banning you, that is not within my power, though I can put my two cents in on the matter.

They may put up with your antics over on that over forum, but here we hold a higher standard.
 
  • #4
Hurkyl said:
And this public display earns you sympathy... how?

No sympathy sought. I wanted people to know censorship is alive and well.
 
  • #5
Janus said:
FYI, I merely moved your post and issued the warning. The reason for the warning was twofold: For vilolating the posting guidlines (which you obviously read) and for posting Crackpot material. As far as the Crackpot material part goes, I calls them as I sees them.

Well I'm glad you have responded. You have my apology for blaming you and calling you names, but my words apply to whoever did do it. I anticipated that the post might be moved, not that it definitely would. I was after all posing a question, not making a statement.

Frankly the responses that I did get here were in good taste and thoughtful. Something I can't really say happens on that other forum. :smile:

Your post was locked by either the Admin or one of the moderators of the forum to which I moved it. Obviously someone else had issues with it, as did the person who reported your post to me.

Understood. And I redirect my personal rath to that person for their ineptitude.

As far as banning you, that is not within my power, though I can put my two cents in on the matter.

Does that mean you'll vouch for me. :biggrin:

They may put up with your antics over on that over forum, but here we hold a higher standard.

Well, I would disagree certainly. My post is not antics. As far as a higher standard, I could vote for that as long as that does not include censorship because a particular person doesn't like the subject.

The fact is we were having a useful dialog. There even seemed to be interest in that one poster indicated he was going to start another thread along the same lines. Wonder if he'll get locked too?

In any case you are off my **** list, at least temporarily.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Fact of the matter you are correct, we believe in censorship on this forum. If you are unable to present accepted Physics your input will be censored. Personal theories are neither welcome nor wanted. We find plenty to discuss without giving a free soapbox to everyone who thinks they are the next Einstein. Generally, unlike Einstein, they are not educated in the current state of Physics and present only garbage. If your thread was moved and locked I will bet you need to take a break to learn some Physics.
 
  • #7
Herding crackpots might even be harder than herding cats.

- Warren
 

1. What is censorship?

Censorship is the act of suppressing or limiting information, ideas, or forms of expression that are deemed harmful or objectionable by those in power. This can include government officials, media outlets, or other individuals or groups.

2. Why do some people believe in censorship?

Some people believe in censorship because they believe it is necessary to protect society from harmful or offensive content. They may also believe that certain ideas or information should not be shared or discussed in order to maintain social order and prevent chaos.

3. How does censorship affect society?

The effects of censorship on society can vary. In some cases, it may limit freedom of speech and hinder the exchange of ideas. It can also lead to a lack of diversity and the suppression of marginalized voices. On the other hand, some argue that censorship can protect individuals from harmful or inappropriate content.

4. What are the arguments against censorship?

There are several arguments against censorship, including the belief that it limits freedom of speech and expression. It can also be used as a tool for those in power to control and manipulate information. Additionally, some argue that censorship can prevent important discussions and stifle creativity and innovation.

5. Is censorship ever justified?

This is a complex question and opinions vary. Some argue that censorship can be justified in certain circumstances, such as to protect national security or to prevent the spread of hate speech. Others believe that censorship is never justified and that individuals should have the right to access and share information freely. Ultimately, whether or not censorship is justified is a matter of personal beliefs and values.

Similar threads

  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
1
Views
409
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
90
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
63
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
10
Views
902
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
855
Replies
3
Views
723

Back
Top