Calculate Horizontal Distance for 12.0g Steel Ball, 32 Degrees

  • Thread starter Thread starter cruelty_free
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horizontal
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the horizontal distance traveled by a steel ball bearing when launched from a compressed spring at an angle of 32 degrees. The context includes concepts from projectile motion and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the initial velocity using a kinematic equation and expresses uncertainty about the next steps. Some participants question the relevance of mass in the calculations, while others clarify the independence of motion from mass in projectile scenarios.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the independence of mass in projectile motion, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the approach or the equations used.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of using mass in the calculations and the assumptions related to the forces acting on the ball during its motion.

cruelty_free
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A small steel ball bearing with a mass of 12.0g is on a short compressed spring. When aimed vertically and suddenly released, the spring sends the bearing to a height of 1.41m. Calculate the horizontal distance the ball would travel if the same spring were aimed 32 degrees for the horizontal.

I found the initial velocity by pluging it into v^2 = V0^2 + 2a(x -x0) which was 5.24m/s, but I'm at a loss of how to proceed from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
Does it make sense to you that the ball's initial speed must be V0 in the second case?
 
thanx! yes it does... I ended up using the equation R= (5.24)^2 sin(2(32 degrees)) / 9.8 but I'm still a lil unsure if that is right because it does not use the mass at all.
 
Since the force of gravity is the only force during the motion, and that the said force is proportional to the object's mass, it follows from Newton's 2.law that the motion is independent of the mass
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
15K