Can a Trillion Stacked Soda Cans Crush the Bottom One?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jongraphs1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of stacking a trillion empty soda cans and whether the weight of the cans would crush the bottom can. Participants explore the implications of weight distribution, structural integrity, and comparisons to real-world structures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the weight of a trillion cans would indeed crush the bottom can, citing the significant total weight of approximately 17 trillion grams.
  • Others argue that the weight would be distributed among the cans, potentially relieving the bottom can of pressure.
  • A participant points out that the stack would exceed 22,350 miles, suggesting that cans at that altitude would not exert downward pressure on the bottom can.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the bottom can would still bear the weight of all cans above it, regardless of distribution, leading to crushing.
  • Some participants reference real-world structures like the Sears Tower to discuss load-bearing capacities, noting that soda cans are not designed to support such extreme weight.
  • One participant suggests that while empty soda cans are not designed for such loads, a specially designed can could potentially withstand the weight of a trillion cans.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the bottom can would be crushed, with some agreeing that it would be, while others contend that weight distribution would prevent this outcome. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the effects of weight distribution and structural integrity without reaching a consensus on the mechanics involved. Assumptions about the properties of soda cans and the nature of weight transfer are discussed but not definitively resolved.

Jongraphs1
The Ultimate Physics Question! Mountain Dew!

Ok. I need you all's help.

If you were to stack empty soda cans on top of each other, one by one, until you have about a trillion cans on top of each other, perfectly balanced, would the weight of the cans cause the bottom can to be crushed?

http://www.bevnet.com/images/reviews/mountaindewlivewire/livewire-logo.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
More responses
 
i think yes aswell

think about it like this, how much do a trillion cans weigh and picture puttting that amount of weight on top of 1 individual can even perfectly balanced i doubt that one can could hold all that weight.

bleh
 
ok yes. It's pretty obvious- we're talking about aluminum vs the wait of a trillion cans- nuff said
 
Yes.

An average empty soda can weighs approximately 17 grams so the combined weight of a trillion cans would be 17 trillion grams.

Yes, if a person can press an empty can against their head and crush it, then I think that 17,000,000,000,000 grams would.
 
Actually, the wieght of all trillion would not rest on the bottom can. Long before the trillienth can, the stack would reach above 22,350 miles (the altitude of geosynchronous orbit) and all cans above that altitude would pull away from the ground, rather than pushing down on it. However, long berfore this, the bottom can would be crushed. The first thousand or so should do the trick.

EDIT TO ADD:

This is assuming, of course, that the stack was on the equator. At the poles, one could stack any arbitrary number of cans and they would still weigh down on the bottom one.
 
Last edited:
Below 22,350 miles would be about 354,024,000 4" long cans at 17 g each that's about 6,018,408,000 grams.

Yup, I still think it's going to crush it.
 
I Disagree.

To all those who said yes, wouldn't you agree that the weight would become evenly distributed amongst the cans, therefore relieving the bottom can of all the pressure?
 
  • #10
Without getting into other complications (for example the higher up the stack you went the less the cans would weigh), all the weight of the cans would be acting through the bottom can meaning it would be well and truly crushed.
 
  • #11
Originally posted by Jongraphs1
To all those who said yes, wouldn't you agree that the weight would become evenly distributed amongst the cans, therefore relieving the bottom can of all the pressure?
If I drop a brick on your head, does it not hurt?

- Warren
 
  • #12
Originally posted by Jongraphs1
I Disagree.

To all those who said yes, wouldn't you agree that the weight would become evenly distributed amongst the cans, therefore relieving the bottom can of all the pressure?

Do the following experiment. Take a scale (one sensitive enough to measure the weight of one can). Place an empty can on it and record the weight. Now stack another can on top of the first and record the weight again. keep adding cans and reading the scale.

Note that the reading on the scale goes up in porportion to the number of cans in the stack. Thus the pressure on the scale increases as more cans are added to the stack. The scale has to support the weight of all the cans in the stack.

If you were to replace the scale with a can, it too must support the weight of all the cans above it.

Each can transfers all the weight of the cans above it, plus its own weight, to the can below it.
 
  • #13
welp you got me there!

I know I am defeated, but my brother says: how do you explain the SEARS Tower?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
The Sears Tower, WTC, Empire State buildings you ask?

The load bearing colums which I believe are re-inforced steel can support the weight of material above it. Granted the lower basements of these buildings have tremendous pressure on the load bearing members, but they hold everything up. There was a show on discovery channel about demolition, and they showed that the pressures of those members at the lower levels is SO Great that if you were able to chip off pieces of material they would shoot off like a bullet from a gun. Thats how much pressure is involved.

But to answer your question, soda cans arent designed to bear so much weight.
 
  • #15
Even though soda cans are designed to withstand a fair amount of pressure for warehouse stacking etc., the empty can you described is not designed to take the weight of a trillion empty cans on top of it. That doesn't mean that a can cannot be designed that could do that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
676