What is the purpose of this NPR feature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the purpose and implications of a feature presented by NPR, which poses a mathematical question that participants are encouraged to solve. The conversation explores the nature of such questions, their relevance to mathematical skill, and the broader context of their use in job interviews and advertising.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about how to approach the NPR feature's question, indicating a lack of clarity on its purpose.
  • One participant provides a link to a potential solution, suggesting that there may be established methods to tackle the question.
  • Another participant argues that the question does not reflect true mathematical skill, but rather the breadth of a person's exposure to various subjects.
  • It is noted that such questions may serve to identify problem solvers who have a genuine interest in mathematics, rather than those who simply meet minimum academic requirements.
  • A participant shares examples of unconventional interview questions that aim to gauge a candidate's creativity and problem-solving abilities, rather than technical knowledge alone.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of clarity in the advertising surrounding the NPR feature, comparing it to other marketing strategies that prioritize curiosity over informative content.
  • One participant critiques the advertising industry, expressing frustration with campaigns that do not clearly communicate their purpose or product.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the value or purpose of the NPR feature. There are competing views regarding the significance of the question posed and its implications for assessing mathematical ability and problem-solving skills.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights various assumptions about the relationship between mathematical questions and the skills they are intended to measure, as well as differing perspectives on advertising strategies and their effectiveness.

Mathematics news on Phys.org
That seems most bizarre (it's not april 1st is it) since knowing the answer to that is not a sign of mathematical skill in the slightest.
 
It may not be a sign of mathematical skill, but it is a sign of the subjects a person has been exposed to. Understanding what the sign is asking for weeds out an awful lot of people. It also measures a few other non-mathematical traits - the few that will successfully log on to the site not only know what a prime number is and what 'e' is, they are problem solvers because they enjoy it, not because they have to be.

I've seen a few other odd 'math' equations for job interviews - "How high can you count on your fingers?" probably being the oddest. 99 would be a very good answer (Chisenbop method), 1023 even better (binary) - 1,048,755 would probably guarantee a person of beating out all the competition on at least this question (a hexadecimal modification of an ancient Chinese finger counting method).

The odd questions are usually not too technical, but require an interest that goes beyond just meeting the normal minimum requirements to complete a course. Microsoft used to be notorious for the 'odd' questions and many of their old job interview questions now circulate around as popular brain teasers.

The reason is because quite a few can 'survive' tough math courses hoping for a good paying job in which maybe they escape having to actually do anything with the math or science they 'survived'. In fact, a few engineers find a job that a data entry technician could do and hang onto that job as long as possible, never even dreaming of advancing to a responsible job. Of course, eventually, management realizes they could find someone much cheaper than an engineer to do the job and transfers the person to more appropriate tasks for an engineer. The person almost always becomes depressed in his new job, starts sending out resumes, and quickly moves on in search of a less technical engineering job.
 
But the bill-board gives no indication of what one might find if one were to "solve" this puzzle (the article actually states this to be a problem to 'solve'). Given the bloody annoying advertising campaigns of, say, More Than (no idea if that company exists outside the Uk/EU, dobut it), whereby the marketing is done without reference to the product in an attempt to build up curiosity, I'm more than likely to think that the people who dreamt up that campaign are annoying morons.

If there were a heading such as 'looking for a more exciting challenge?' then I could understand it. Note this is a comment about the PR people. The armed forces have such campaigns on UK tv.

More Than, for those who haven't seen the damn thing, used to post fake flyers and adverts about a lost dog, called Lucky. They did lots of variations in an attempt to get their name known before they'd even launched any products. I'm with Bill Hicks on this one: if you're in advertising, kill yourself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K