
#1
Sep3010, 05:21 PM

P: 11

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Consider the collection F of all real numbers of the form x+y√2, where x and y are rational numbers. Prove (by direct verification) that F satisfies all the field axioms (just like R) under the usual addition and multiplication. 2. Relevant equations Field axioms: There exist two binary operations, called addition + and multiplication ∗, such that the following hold: 1) commutativity x + y = y + x, xy = yx 2) associativity x + (y + z) = (x + y) + z, x(yz) = (xy)z 3) distributivity x(y + z) = xy + xz 4) Existence of 0; 1 such that x + 0 = x, 1 · x = x, 5) Existence of negatives: For every x there exists y such that x + y = 0. 6) Existence of reciprocals: For every x ̸= 0 there exists y such that xy = 1. 3. The attempt at a solution I just want to make sure I did this right. If you were to prove that a collection F ( a collection of all real #'s of the form x+y[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] where x & y are rational numbers ) satisfies all of the field axioms by direct verification, would you just do something like suppose m,n,o belong to F. then m=x_{1}+y_{1}[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex], etc. and then you just say m+(n+o) = x_{1}+y_{1}[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] + ..... until you return to m+n+o = (m+n)+o ??? And then proceed to do so for all the axioms mentioned above? It's supposed to be really trivial right? 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data 2. Relevant equations 3. The attempt at a solution 



#2
Sep3010, 05:43 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606

You're on the right track. To be completely rigorous, I'd add the steps to verify that the set F is actually closed under addition and multiplication. That is, for any [tex]x,y\in F[/tex]
1. [tex]x+y\in F,[/tex] 2. [tex]xy \in F.[/tex] Kind of trivial as you say, but proofs are about covering all of the bases. 



#3
Sep3010, 06:26 PM

P: 11

Why is it necessary to claim that the set F is closed under addition and multiplication for any x,y \in F? In other words, what would happen if the set wasn't closed under addition and multiplication, is it possible for the axioms to hold and this to still be true? Or does it mean that it's impossible for the axioms to hold if the set is not closed under addition and multiplication. 



#4
Sep3010, 06:31 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606

Prove that F satisfies all field axioms by method of direct verification 



#5
Sep3010, 06:34 PM

P: 11

Got it, You've been a big help. 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Prove that F satisfies all field axioms by method of direct verification  Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics  1  
Prove the following (using some basic axioms)  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4  
Axioms cannot prove falsity?  General Discussion  10  
Verification of Method  Calculus  2 