Calculating Vectorian Field Rotor with Stock's Theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Stokes' Theorem to calculate a line integral of a vector field defined by the expression S(xz^2-y)dx+(3x-yz^2)dy+(zx^2-zy^2)dz around a curve formed by the intersection of the surfaces x^2+y^2=1 and z=xy. Participants explore the necessary steps to apply the theorem, including finding the curl of the vector field and determining the appropriate surface for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the curve and the vector field, stating the curl is (0,0,4) and expresses uncertainty about constructing a surface for integration.
  • Another participant interprets "stocks" as a misunderstanding of "Stokes" and clarifies that the problem involves integrating the vector function around the intersection of the surfaces.
  • A suggestion is made to use the surface z=xy for applying Stokes' Theorem, noting that any surface with the same boundary can be used.
  • There is a discussion about the terminology, with one participant correcting the spelling of "Stokes" and "curl," while another humorously defends their choice of wording.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the original terminology for curl and the attribution of Stokes' Theorem to Lord Kelvin.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of Stokes' Theorem but exhibit some confusion regarding terminology and the specifics of the integration process. There is no consensus on the best approach to construct the surface for integration.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the integration limits and the normal vector for the surface, indicating that these aspects remain unresolved.

ori
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
c is a curve of the cutting of the to surfaces:
x^2+y^2=1
z=xy
at the point (1,0,0) the tangent to C is toward j^
so what is
S(xz^2-y)dx+(3x-yz^2)dy+(zx^2-zy^2)dz
C
?

hmm..
i calculated this vectorian field rotor: it's (0,0,4)
i know i should use stocks and make it
SS(0,0,4)*n^ ds
but how can i build a surface (so i could know the integration borders and what is the normal)?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
come again?
 
(Ori, I hope you are not offended by our confusion. I assume that English is not your native language and I assure you that your English is far better than my command of whatever language is your native language!) :smile:

I'm not at all sure what "stocks" are here and I THINK that "vector rotor" is the curl. I'm pretty sure this person is using "S" to indicate integral and the problem is to integrate the vector function (xz^2-y)dx+(3x-yz^2)dy+(zx^2-zy^2)dz
around the intersection of the surfaces given by x^2+y^2=1 and z=xy.

Aha! Stoke's theorem! x2+ y2= 1 is the cylinder along the z-axis. We can write that in parametric equations as x= cos(θ), y= sin(θ), z= z (with θ and z as parameters) and the intersection of that with z= xy is x= cos(θ), y= sin(θ), z= sin(θ)cos(θ).
Integrating the vector function around that curve would be tricky but doable. To use Stoke's theorem you need to find the curl of the given vector function.

You don't really need to find an expression for a surface inside that boundary. The nice thing about Stoke's theorem is that it applies to ANY surface having that boundary.

Take as your surface the surface z= xy itself. Here is how I would do it:
f(x,y,z)= xy- z= 0 has z= xy as a "level surface": div f= yi+ xj- zk is perpendicular to that surface and we can "normalize" to the projection onto the xy-plane by dividing by the k component: Integrate the dot product
((xz^2-y)i+(3x-yz^2)j+(zx^2-zy^2)k).(-y/z, -x/z,1)dx dy.

You will, of course, need to use z= xy to reduce the integral to x,y only. The integration is over the unit disk so you may want to convert to polar coordinates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
10x
my native lang is hebrew
 
Your English is fine. It is "Stoke's theorem", not "Stock's" and "vector rotor" for "curl" makes sense to me! I've also noticed that in another thread you referred to Green's "sentence". The English word is "formula" (if not "theorem").
 
Oh right Stokes' Theorem--- I was wondering for a second hehe.
 
look guys
if i was writing stoke's theorem it was borring
if I am writing stocks theorem, it's attracts ppl to read - maybe there's a new mathmatical theorem about stocks etc.. plus it sound like stoke's..
(kiddin :rolleyes: , it just a spelling mistake)
 
by the way, the original term for curl, in maxwell's book, was "rotation". and "stokes" theorem is apparently due originally to lord kelvin.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K