|Jul31-03, 12:19 AM||#1|
Local Resident Presents "bigfoot" As Biological Fact
""The more evidence that comes forth, the harder it is to refute," Brown continued. "People just can't seem to come to grips with the fact that there is a possibility that one of the most important biological finds possibly exists right here in the backyard of the most technologically advanced country in the world unknown."
|Jul31-03, 08:55 AM||#2|
This story confused me alot in
relation to other things I've
heard about the hair samples.
The hair of the Yeti and it's
regional permutaions, was found
to be closest to bear fur, though
not identical. This suggested to
me that the resemblance to hom-
onid was spurious, coincidental,
in the same way one first assumes
whales are a form of fish.
This is the first I've read
that resemblence to the orangutan
has been discovered.
Native Americans do not consider
it to be an animal at all. Their
intuition is that it is a very
different, strange kind of human,
so different from all the other
kinds of humans that no meaning-
ful interaction or mutual under-
standing is possible.
|Similar Threads for: Local Resident Presents "bigfoot" As Biological Fact|
|Why has the Patterson-Gimlin "bigfoot" film never been exactly duplicated?||General Discussion||65|
|"Bigfoot" Fever Grips Malaysian Rainforest||General Discussion||0|
|New "Bigfoot" found in the Congo||Biology||0|