Normal Distribution Quick Q


by zmike
Tags: distribution, normal
zmike
zmike is offline
#1
Oct17-10, 12:37 PM
P: 103
I am a bit confused with the notation, Whenever I see N(mu,alpha) does that mean the data set is normal and does it also mean that it's standard normal?

Is there a difference between using Z~N(mu,alpha) vs. X~N(mu,alpha)? does the Z indicate standard normal?, if so why don't we just use Z(mu,alpha)?


Can I still use this notation N(_,_) when the data set is NOT normal?

THANKS IN ADVANCE :D
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
SensaBubble: It's a bubble, but not as we know it (w/ video)
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Microbes provide insights into evolution of human language
mathman
mathman is online now
#2
Oct17-10, 04:05 PM
Sci Advisor
P: 5,942
Standard notation: X~N(m,d) means X is a random variable, with a normal distribution having a mean m and standard deviation d. If you wrote Z(m,d) then you need to define Z. N(m,d) means the distribution is normal - you can't use it for something else - it is a matter of notation.

If d is unknown for a normal distribution with a known m, then, as you observed, you can specify the midpoint of the distribution, but nothing else.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Normal Distribution v. Student's T Distribution Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
normal distribution Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 7
normal distribution E(x)=U Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Normal distribution Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 1
Phi- normal distribution (how to look normal tables!!!) Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 3