| New Reply |
Normal Distribution Quick Q |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Oct17-10, 12:37 PM | #1 |
|
|
Normal Distribution Quick Q
I am a bit confused with the notation, Whenever I see N(mu,alpha) does that mean the data set is normal and does it also mean that it's standard normal?
Is there a difference between using Z~N(mu,alpha) vs. X~N(mu,alpha)? does the Z indicate standard normal?, if so why don't we just use Z(mu,alpha)? Can I still use this notation N(_,_) when the data set is NOT normal? THANKS IN ADVANCE :D |
| Oct17-10, 04:05 PM | #2 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Standard notation: X~N(m,d) means X is a random variable, with a normal distribution having a mean m and standard deviation d. If you wrote Z(m,d) then you need to define Z. N(m,d) means the distribution is normal - you can't use it for something else - it is a matter of notation.
If d is unknown for a normal distribution with a known m, then, as you observed, you can specify the midpoint of the distribution, but nothing else. |
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Normal Distribution Quick Q
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Normal Distribution v. Student's T Distribution | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 2 | ||
| normal distribution | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 7 | ||
| normal distribution E(x)=U | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Normal distribution | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 1 | ||
| Phi- normal distribution (how to look normal tables!!!) | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 3 | ||