Hermitian Operators and Imaginary Numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the implications of imaginary numbers in operator products and the conditions for certain combinations of operators to remain Hermitian. Participants explore definitions, mathematical manipulations, and examples related to Hermitian operators.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants discuss how to determine if the operator i(AB-BA) is Hermitian, with one participant suggesting that it is not Hermitian based on the properties of Hermitian operators.
  • There is a mathematical exploration of the expression (AB+BA/2) to show it is Hermitian, with participants using definitions and properties of Hermitian operators to analyze the interchange of operators.
  • One participant mentions Wigner's prescription for constructing a Hermitian operator corresponding to the product of two observables, suggesting 1/2(AB + BA) as a solution, while noting that there are other forms possible.
  • Participants clarify that if operators A and B do not commute, the difference between the operator and its conjugate is not zero, leading to further discussion on the implications of commutation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions and properties of Hermitian operators, but there is no consensus on the specific outcomes regarding the Hermitian nature of certain combinations of operators, as some participants express uncertainty or propose different interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps regarding the manipulation of operators and the conditions under which certain expressions are Hermitian. The discussion reflects varying levels of comfort with the mathematical treatment of multiple operators.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners of quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in operator theory and the properties of Hermitian operators in the context of observables.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
So I understand what a hermitian operator is and how if A and B are hermitian operators, then the product of AB is not necessarily Hermitian since


*Note here + is dagger

(AB)+=B+A+=BA

I also recognize that (AB-BA) is not Hermitian since (AB-BA)+=B+A+-A+B+

In addition, I know that any real number a is a Hermitian operator since <Psi l|a Psi n>=<aPsi l|Psi n>

Now here comes my questions.
Where A and B are both hermitian operators,
1)how do we know if something like i(AB-BA) is a hermitian operator where i is an imaginary number? How do I show that this is not a hermitian operator because I am pretty sure it is not?

2) and how would I show that (AB+BA/2) is Hermitian because I feel like it should be, but I don't know how to interchange the 2 with the A and B operators?

And if operator A corresponds to observable A, and operator B corresponds to observable B, what is a "good" (i.e.Hermitian) operator that corresponds to the physically observable product AB?


When I am dealing with two operators, I don't think I am confused on how to work with them, but when dealing with 3 I get a little iffy. Peace and love.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ed Quanta said:
Where A and B are both hermitian operators,
1)how do we know if something like i(AB-BA) is a hermitian operator where i is an imaginary number? How do I show that this is not a hermitian operator because I am pretty sure it is not?

[ i(AB-BA)]+ = (-i)(B+ A+ - A+ B+) = (-i) (BA-AB) = i(AB-BA)


2) and how would I show that (AB+BA/2) is Hermitian because I feel like it should be, but I don't know how to interchange the 2 with the A and B operators?

(AB+BA/2)+ - (AB+BA/2) = BA + AB/2 - AB - BA/2 = BA/2 - AB/2 = [B,A] / 2

So if A and B do not commute, the difference between your operator and its conjugate is not 0 (because equal to the commutator divided by 2).

And if operator A corresponds to observable A, and operator B corresponds to observable B, what is a "good" (i.e.Hermitian) operator that corresponds to the physically observable product AB?

1/2 (AB + BA).

(Wigner's prescription, I think it is called).

It is not unique, of course ;
you can have 1/2(AB + BA) + c i [A,B] with c an arbitrary real number for example.


cheers,
Patrick.
 
:smile:
Ed Quanta said:
1)how do we know if something like i(AB-BA) is a hermitian operator where i is an imaginary number? How do I show that this is not a hermitian operator because I am pretty sure it is not?

2) and how would I show that (AB+BA/2) is Hermitian because I feel like it should be, but I don't know how to interchange the 2 with the A and B operators?

And if operator A corresponds to observable A, and operator B corresponds to observable B, what is a "good" (i.e.Hermitian) operator that corresponds to the physically observable product AB?

Hi, here are the answers
1) Just use the definition of "Hermitian" : A+ = A and B+ = B (they are hermitian)
so you get :

[ i(AB-BA)]+ = (-i)(B+ A+ - A+ B+) = (-i) (BA-AB) and this equals i(AB-BA)



2) Same system, man, just use the definition of hermitian operators :

(AB+BA/2)+ - (AB+BA/2) = (BA + AB/2) - AB - BA/2 = BA/2 - AB/2 = [B,A] / 2

If A and B are not commuting operators then the difference between the given operator and its conjugate is not 0 . If A and B commute then the commutator will be 0 !

3) this is an easy one and the answer is

1/2 (AB + BA)


regards
marlon
 
Sorry, Patrick

I did not see you already answered this question...

I apologize for that...

marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
14K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K