Can Science Answer All Important Human Questions?

  • Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Science
In summary, the scope of science covers demonstrable inquiries related to the natural universe. While science may not be able to answer all important questions, it has been efficient in driving technological progress. Creation Science is considered a true science in terms of methodology, but may differ from secular academic sciences. This discussion has been moved to a different forum.
  • #1
dekoi
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?
--------------

Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?
------------

Is Science 'efficient' ?
------------

Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

-----------


Would be greatly interesting to see some of the subjective statements made by members. Thanks for being such good participants like always.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. Scientific ones
2. define important
3 define efficient
4. is a dangerous question to ask, and possibly outside the remit of this forum.
 
  • #3
science is a tool that allows us to understand our environment in the what, when, where, how, and why. the sharper that tool, the better we can understand it. it is possible that science can answer the unanswered philosophical questions of our modern time.
 
  • #4
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?

Demonstrable inquiries. Speculation about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin is a theological and philosophical inquiry, not a scientific one.


--------------


Quote:
Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?

No, science is a philosophical method or tool, no different from logistics or semantics. Philosophy or theology may be able to answer such questions, but science is a method, not an answer or series of answers.

------------


Quote:
Is Science 'efficient' ?

Sometimes. Like any tool it can be used, abused, and neglected.


------------


Quote:
Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

Again, science is a methodology for collecting and organizing data. Creation Science is a true science in this sense of the word, but is not a science in the sense of secular academic sciences which promote experimentation and objectivity.
 
  • #5
Great answers. I'm glad i was able to post questions which only the most intelligent could answer in a valid way.

Thank you.
 
  • #6
dekoi said:
What sort of inquiry is within the scope of science?

Science can address questions related to the natural universe, which are questions that have the potential of empirical verification or falsification. However, some metaphysical positions (e.g. naturalism) state that all that exists is the natural universe, and in this case any question is within the realm of science.

dekoi said:
Can science hope to answer all the important questions humans are looking for answers to?

What is an unimportant question? I have never known one. :smile:

dekoi said:
Is Science 'efficient' ?

If we consider scientific progress over the past 300 years in comparison with the rest of history and science's impact on technology, then, yes, science has been efficient, particularly during the last 100 years. Our ability to control the motion of invisible electrons has resulted in technology our ancestors would have deemed magical. It's exciting to think about where science and technology will be going in the next 100 years.

dekoi said:
Are creation scientists really scientists at all? Are they wasting their time in an arena that they simply can't hope to 'win' in?

This question is best asked in the religion section of the forum.
 
  • #7
I appreciate the reply Artorius, although i have transferred by discussion about this topic to "The Scientific Method" posted by Glenn. See you there. :)
 

1. What are the main limitations to scientific research?

Some of the main limitations to scientific research include funding constraints, ethical considerations, and the availability of technology or resources.

2. How does bias impact the results of scientific studies?

Bias, whether conscious or unconscious, can greatly impact the results of scientific studies. It can lead to selective data gathering, interpretation, and reporting, which can affect the validity and generalizability of the findings.

3. Can scientific knowledge be considered absolute or is it always changing?

Scientific knowledge is always subject to change as new evidence and data is constantly being discovered and analyzed. What is considered a fact in science today may be disproven tomorrow.

4. What are the limitations of using statistical analyses in scientific research?

While statistical analysis is an important tool in scientific research, it also has its limitations. These include the potential for errors or biases in data collection and analysis, as well as the difficulty in determining causation versus correlation.

5. How can societal and cultural norms impact the objectivity of scientific research?

Societal and cultural norms can influence the questions that are asked and the methods used in scientific research, which can impact the objectivity of the results. Additionally, the interpretation and application of scientific findings can be influenced by cultural biases and beliefs.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
910
Replies
15
Views
989
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
741
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
709
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
659
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top