Showing by definition that limits exist

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsuser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Limits
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the existence of limits using formal definitions, specifically focusing on the limit as x approaches 3 for the function 5(x^2) - 17. Participants explore the epsilon-delta definition of limits and the implications of their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the manipulation of inequalities to establish limits, questioning how to properly introduce epsilon in their calculations. There are attempts to relate delta and epsilon through various expressions and assumptions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the proper sequence of introducing epsilon and delta, while others are exploring specific calculations and questioning the validity of their approaches. Multiple interpretations of the limit definitions are being examined without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of constraints such as assuming values for delta and epsilon, and the applicability of the limit definitions to different functions, particularly in cases where the limit approaches infinity or involves discontinuities.

physicsuser
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
I am having trouble with showing by definition that limits exist. For example limit as x goes to 3 for 5(x^2)-17


3-D < x < 3+D

28-E < 5x^2 - 17 < 28+E
45-E < 5x^2 < 45+E
9-E/5 < x^2 < 9+E/5
sqrRoot(9-E/5) < x < sqrRoot(9+E/5)

so does it mean that 3-D=sqrRoot(9-E/5) ?
then D=3+-sqrRoot(9-E/5)? If it is correct, can you do it without knowing the limit?

In linear equation you can solve it without even knowing the limit:

lim x goes to 3 for 5x - 17

3-D < x < 3+D

L=limit (5*3-17=-2)

L-E < 5x - 17 < L+E
L+17-E < 5x < L+17+E
(L+17)/5 - E/5 < x < (L+17)/5 + E/5

(L+17)/5=3
L+17=15
L=-2

3- E/5 < x < 3+ E/5

So D=E/5
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. When doing limits exercises, introduce "epsilon" at the latest possible stage in your actual calculations!
2. Let's take your exercise in detail:
Let [tex]|x-3|<\delta[/tex]:
Then, we have, guessing at 28 as our limit:
[tex]|(5x^{2}-17)-28|=5|x-3||x+3|[/tex]
Assume [tex]\delta<1[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]|(5x^{2}-17)-28|=5|x-3||x+3|<5\delta{4}=20\delta[/tex]
By choosing [tex]\delta=minimum(1,\frac{\epsilon}{20})[/tex]
we have bounded our error within a margin of [tex]\epsilon[/tex]
 
how do you get [tex]5|x-3||x+3|<5\delta{4}=20\delta[/tex] ?
 
This is as far as I get...

|x-3|<D
|5x^2-17 - 5x0^2+17|<E
5|x^2-x0^2|<E
|(x-x0)(x+x0)|<E/5

x0=3
and |x-3|<D
then D=E/(5|x+3|)

How do you get 20?
 
By assuming D<1, |x+3|<4.
As I've said, do not introduce E in your calculations before you have to.
 
I see, but this does not apply to every function does it?

lim as x goes to 0 for 1/x^2

|x-x0|<D

|1/x^2 - 1/x0^2| =
|(x0^2-x^2)/(x^2)(x0^2)| =
|(x^2-x0^2)/(-x0^2)(x^2)| =
|(x-x0)(x+x0)/(-x0^2)(x^2)|<E

D=E(-x0^2)(x^2)/(x+x0)
and since x0=0 then D=0 ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K