Travelling at the speed of light?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of traveling at relativistic speeds, specifically half the speed of light, and the behavior of observers moving at such speeds relative to each other. Participants explore the relativistic addition of velocities, the behavior of light (photons), and the implications of special relativity in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether traveling at half the speed of light from A to B and another person traveling at half the speed of light from B to A would result in them observing each other traveling at the speed of light.
  • Another participant provides the relativistic velocity addition formula, suggesting that the two would observe each other traveling at 0.8c based on their calculations.
  • A different participant notes that at speeds much lower than the speed of light, velocities can be added algebraically, leading to negligible differences in observed velocities for speeds significantly less than c.
  • One participant raises a hypothetical scenario about two photons moving towards each other, questioning how they would perceive each other's motion if they both travel at the speed of light.
  • Another participant clarifies that the equation used is derived from Lorentz transformations and relates to special relativity, stating that reference frames at the speed of light are not valid.
  • One participant reiterates the point about low-speed velocity addition being approximately linear, emphasizing that this approximation holds true for speeds much lower than c.
  • A participant discusses the calculation of relative velocities for photons, noting that while the results appear consistent, there are underlying assumptions that may not hold true for light-speed scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of light and the application of relativistic velocity addition. There is no consensus on the implications of photons observing each other or the validity of the relativistic formulas at light speed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the relativistic addition of velocities is valid only for speeds less than the speed of light, and there are unresolved assumptions regarding the behavior of photons in this context.

Einstein
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
If I was traveling at half the speed of light from A to B and another person traveling at half the speed of light from B to A (not directly towards each other, side-by-side), would i be traveling at the speed of light relative to the other person. If so, what would i see when i look at this other person?
 
Science news on Phys.org
v = (u + v')/(1 + uv'/c2)

This is how to sum two velocites, u and v', in SR where c is the speed of light in the vacuum.

If we input the velocities into the equation as a fraction of c, then all the c's oin the bottom of the equation cancel and we're left with:

v = (0.5c + 0.5c)/(1 + 0.25) = 0.8c

Therefore you will observe the other person traveling at 0.8c or 4/5 of the speed of light relative to you.
 
Last edited:
I'll just add for speeds a lot lower that c the two velocities do add algerbraically, that is :

v ≈ u + v'

for values of u and v' significantly smaller than c.

For example, taking two objects that both appear to be traveling ~650 mph (10-6 c) in oppoiste directions to a 'stationary' observer the difference in observed velocities will only be about 1 part in a trillion.
 
Last edited:
So, according to your theory:

If 2 photons were moving towards each other, both moving at the speed of light:

v = (c + c)/(1 + c^2/c^2) = 2c/2 = c

The photons would observe each other moving at the speed of light? If that's the case, how can it tell whether the other photon is moving at all of not?

v = (c + 0)/(1 + 0/c^2) = c/1 = c
 
It's not my theory, it's Lorentz's/Einstein's (the equation is derived from the Lorentz transformations), it's called the special theory of relativity.

According to the transformation, both photons would observe each other traveling at the speed of light, but reference frames at this speed are forbidden anyway.
 
Originally posted by jcsd
I'll just add for speeds a lot lower that c the two velocities do add algerbraically, that is :

v ≈ u + v'

for values of u and v' significantly smaller than c.

For example, taking two objects that both appear to be traveling ~650 mph (10-6 c) in oppoiste directions to a 'stationary' observer the difference in observed velocities will only be about 1 part in a trillion.

Actually the same rule holds for low speeds - it holds for all speeds, but if you try it for speeds around a billionth of c, which are the speeds we encounter (feet per second) then the Lorentz formula becomes normal addition to a high degree of accuracy. But there is no cutoff where relativity addition stops and the familiar addition begins.
 
One photon has velocity +c and the other photon has velocity -c, both relative to some initially-given reference frame.
The relative velocities ought to be calculated by a difference formula:

u' = (u - v)/(1 - uv/c2)

.

So, for the velocity of the +c photon relative to the -c photon,

u' = ((+c) - (-c))/(1-(+c)(-c)/c2) = (+2c)/(+2) = +c

For the velocity of the -c photon relative to the +c photon,

u' = ((-c) - (+c))/(1-(-c)(+c)/c2) = (-2c)/(+2) = -c

. The relative velocities would be equal in magnitude, but oppositely directed.

There is a problem with all this. In order to derive composition theorems like this, guaranteeing that the postulates of special relativity are enforced, it is necessary to assume implicitly that all relative velocities between observers have magnitudes less than c. So, it is not a foregone conclusion that the two photons define reference frames for which the composition formula is valid. But it does appear to give "appropriate" answers. One photon gets a relative velocity of +c and the other gets a relative velocity of -c.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K