Switching Time Formula: Step-by-Step Guide for Changing a Formula [SOLVED]

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheShapeOfTime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around rearranging a kinematic equation to solve for time, specifically the formula delta d = Vi * delta t + 1/2 * a * delta t^2. Participants are exploring the algebraic manipulation required to isolate the variable delta t.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of rewriting the equation in a standard quadratic form. There are questions about identifying constants and the implications of negative values in the equation. Some participants express confusion about the roots of quadratic equations and their relevance to the problem.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem by rewriting the equation into a standard quadratic form. There is acknowledgment of varying levels of understanding among participants, and some have begun to clarify their thoughts on the constants involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding basic algebraic concepts, and some participants express a desire for clearer explanations. The original poster also notes a need for improvement in formulating questions and equations.

TheShapeOfTime
[SOLVED] Changing a Formula

How do I switch the following formula for time?

delta d = Vi * delta t + 1/2 * a * delta t^2


d = distance
Vi = initial velocity
a = acceleration
t = time


Any sort of steps would be greatly appreciated as I don't just want the answer, I always like to know how it's done :).

P.S. Sorry about the wording of the question and how the formula is written out, I need to get better at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the roots of a quadratic equation..?
 
arildno said:
What are the roots of a quadratic equation..?

Sorry, but I don't really get what you mean (noobness :\). All I can tell you is that I know you solve quadratic equations by factoring.

EDIT: I removed my nonsense ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know how to solve for x the following equation, right?:
ax^2+bx+c=0 (a,b,c constants)
 
arildno said:
You know how to solve for x the following equation, right?:
ax^2+bx+c=0 (a,b,c constants)


Looks like you replied while I was editing my post. My answer is yes.
 
It seems you have severe problems with simple algebra (your edit is sheer nonsense).
Now, in order to proceed, try to rewrite your original equation into a form:
[tex]K_{1}(\delta{t})^{2}+K_{2}(\delta{t})+K_{3}=0[/tex]
where [tex]K_{1},K_{2},K_{3}[/tex] are constants (identify them!)
([tex]\delta{t}[/tex] is "delta t")
 
arildno said:
It seems you have severe problems with simple algebra (your edit is sheer nonsense).
Now, in order to proceed, try to rewrite your original equation into a form:
[tex]K_{1}(\delta{t})^{2}+K_{2}(\delta{t})+K_{3}=0[/tex]
where [tex]K_{1},K_{2},K_{3}[/tex] are constants (identify them!)
([tex]\delta{t}[/tex] is "delta t")

[tex] K_{1} = 1/2a, K_{2} = Vf, K_{3} = d[/tex]

Also, wouldn't it be [tex]-K_{3}[/tex], or am I wrong?
 
What's wrong with setting:
[tex]K_{3}=-\delta{d}[/tex]
Now, you should be able to determine which values [tex]\delta{t}[/tex]
Choose the root which is makes sense physically.
 
I understand now, thanks for helping me out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K