Is global warming a natural phenomenon?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether global warming is a natural phenomenon or primarily driven by human activities. Participants explore various aspects of global warming, including its causes, effects, and the interplay between natural and anthropogenic factors. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, personal observations, and challenges to prevailing narratives.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that global warming is a natural phenomenon, suggesting that while human activities enhance it through carbon dioxide emissions, natural processes also play a significant role.
  • Others argue that the Earth has always experienced temperature fluctuations, implying that global warming could occur independently of human influence.
  • A participant questions the current state of global warming, noting that local observations, such as beach wave patterns and vegetation growth, do not seem to support the idea of significant warming over the past decades.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of claims regarding global warming, with references to historical temperature records and the potential for exaggeration by certain groups.
  • Some participants acknowledge the complexity of the issue, likening it to a jigsaw puzzle with many unknowns, and express uncertainty about the extent of human impact versus natural variability.
  • There is mention of the greenhouse effect and its dual role in both warming and cooling the planet, with some suggesting that other factors, such as solar activity, may also influence global temperatures.
  • One participant notes that while natural factors can cause temperature changes, it remains unclear whether human activities can significantly alter global temperatures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether global warming is primarily a natural phenomenon or driven by human activities. Multiple competing views remain, with ongoing debate about the evidence and implications of each perspective.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions of global warming and the greenhouse effect, as well as the influence of various natural factors. Observations made by individuals may be limited and subjective, contributing to the complexity of the discussion.

no idea
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
is global warming a natural phenomenon? I think it is . But we can enhanced it such as we produce tonnes of carbon dioxide every day, causing the greehouse effect strengthen and finally lead to global warming .
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
One thing is for certain. The Earth never has had the exact same temperature year after year, decade after decade, century after century. So with or without mankind, the Earth would still be experiencing either a warming trend or a cooling trend.

But natural or manmade, is global warming even happening? Astronomy magazine reported last year that the 20th century was not the warmest century of the past 1000 years, but only average.

If mankind is causing warming, I don't want to ignore it, but I do realize that a group of people who I call "the sky is falling" crowd are eagar to jump onto the global warming bandwagon. This drags down the credibility of the real scientists. This same group of people brought us Y2K, and backed it up with support from computer professionals.

I'm not trying to claim that global warming is not happening, but if it is, it makes me wonder why:

The waves at the beach near my house don't break any further inland than they did 30 years ago when I was a small kid. Since the beach gradually slopes to the water, a small difference in sea level makes a huge difference in how far the waves break. A 6 foot difference between low and high tide can make a 600 foot difference in where the waves break. I know this because I got trapped on a small beach with my dogs, when we walked past some rocks, and on our return, the rocks were under water. But returning at a different time during low tide, I've witnessed the waves breaking about 200 yards from these rocks. So even a 1 inch rise in sea level should cause the waves to break an average of ~8 feet further inland.

A warmer global temperature should raise sea level. As water heats, it expands, and parts of the world where water temperature is teetering around 32 degrees Fahrenheit should be rapidly melting and raising sea level too.

I also wonder why vegitation is not doing better today than 30 years ago. Greenhouse gardeners heat their greenhouses and pump in extra carbon dioxide to make their plants grow better. If we've really increased C02 levels and temperatures worldwide, the plants should be loving it.

The highest temperature ever recorded was 136 degrees in Death Valley, California in 1913. If the world is warmer today than back then, you'd expect that the highest temperature ever recorded would have taken place in the 90 or early 2000s.

I find myself wanting to jump on the global warming bandwagon every time we have a heatwave, or hear of record heatwaves elsewhere (like Europe last year). But then I realize that the world does not seem any warmer to me now that it was when I was a kid. And heat waves happen even in an ice age. Back when wooly mamoths roamed the Earth, there was still one day per century that took the prize of being the hottest day of the century.

Also, all the consequences of global warming seem to be negative. More violent storms, destruction of habitat... I've even heard one person say that there will be no more coral reefs in 50 years because of global warming. To me this implies that the "sky is falling crowd" has got their teeth sunk deep into this one. If the world were 5 degrees colder on average, and warming up, would these same people be talking about how everything was getting better? I doubt it.

I've also noticed that every time a large chunck of ice breaks off Antartica or somewhere in the Artic, everybody screams global warming. Haven't large icebergs been dropping into the sea for millions of years? And why is it always ignored when it snows in Antartica's interior, where the fallen snow will stay trapped as water ice for thousands or millions of years, balancing the icebergs that break off.

Again, I think wheather or not the world is warming, and whether or not mankind is fully or partially responsible is something that should be fully studied. But it is important to separate the real science from the theories put forth by "sky is falling" crowd.
 
The global warming subject is like a really big jigsaw-puzzle.
And we only have some pieces on the edges.

There is something changing, if its us or mother nature herself?
I don't know, guess nobody does.
What i do know (or more have the feeling) that there are more records broken on the area of rainfall, temperatures and number of violent storms in the last couple of years than in the last 2 decades before.
Or it might be that ppl notice it more now than they did before, which leads you back to the bandwagon and the "the sky is falling" neurotics.

Anyway, if mankind has managed to start a proces of warming/cooling.
Whats to worrie about, if it took us a 100 years to put it into motion, it probably is a moving train now.
And we're all on it for the ride.
 
CO2 in the air causes the greenhouse effect, but it also causes cloud cover, which blocks sunlight and cools. I would be more worried about the wobble effect than emmisons from our factories, when global warming is concerned.
 
no idea said:
is global warming a natural phenomenon? I think it is . But we can enhanced it such as we produce tonnes of carbon dioxide every day, causing the greehouse effect strengthen and finally lead to global warming .
The "greenhouse effect" is a natural phenomena - "global warming" is what humans are adding to it, above and beyond the normal greenhouse effect.
 
Both the greenhouse effect and global warming are natural effects. other 'natural' factors, such as sun spots could cause an increase in global temperatures, global warming.
however, the term 'global warming' is often used as shorthand for anthropogenic global warming (AGW), that is, global warming caused by humans. AGW is a mechanism typically theorized as an increase in atmospheric CO2 (one of the main terrestrial greenhouse gases along with methane, water vapor, ozone) due to fossil fuel consumption that causes more of the sun's energy to be trapped within the atmosphere, thus resulting in higher temperatures in the atmosphere and on land/sea.

considering the ice ages, volcanoes (mt pinotubo decreased global temps by 0.5C the year after it's most recent eruption), and Andre's clathrate, global tempuratures appear to change dramatically (occasionally) without humans. but that doesn't mean that human's CAN'T noticeably change the global temperatures...but it doesn't mean they CAN, either.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K