Where Does the Energy Go During Deconstructive Interference?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wonderland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superposition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of deconstructive interference in wave phenomena, specifically addressing the question of where the energy goes during such interference. Participants explore theoretical implications, interpretations of energy states, and experimental observations related to waves, including electromagnetic fields and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that at points of complete deconstructive interference, the energy sums to zero, indicating that there was no net energy in the waves initially.
  • Others express confusion regarding the concept of "negative" energy and propose that it may be less confusing when viewed in the context of a system containing both positive and negative energy, as per the principle of quantum inequality.
  • One participant raises the question of what happens to the energy at the moment of deconstructive interference before any constructive superposition occurs.
  • Another viewpoint discusses the transfer of energy between different modes in wave interactions, noting that while one mode experiences a minimum, another experiences a maximum.
  • A historical reference is made to an experiment involving neutrons that allegedly ceased to exist during destructive interference, prompting questions about the fate of their mass energy.
  • Some participants find the concept of energy nebulous and express bafflement at the implications of neutrons behaving as waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and hypotheses regarding energy during deconstructive interference, with no clear consensus reached on the nature of energy transfer or the implications of negative energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding related to the definitions of energy states and the conditions under which deconstructive interference occurs, as well as the temporal aspects of energy transitions.

wonderland
right, um, deconstructive inteference; where does the energy go? [?]
 
Science news on Phys.org
It is my understanding that any wave entity oscillates between positive and negative. At a point of complete deconstructive interference, (+x)+(-x)=0, x being half the peak to peak energy difference. Statistically, there was no net energy in either wave in the first place.
 
Yer but it's like the whole notion of "negative" energy, I find it kinda confuddling
 
Originally posted by wonderland
Yer but it's like the whole notion of "negative" energy, I find it kinda confuddling

Perhaps it is a problem of trying to deal with the wave as an isolated identity. In a wave train, if two waves interfere destructively, then somewhere else along the way two other waves interfere constructively, do they not? As for negative energy, it is less confusing when viewed in context. According to the principle of quantum inequality, any amount of negative energy can only exist withtin or as a part of a system that contains a greater amount of positive energy. So the net energy is always positive.
 
In reference to there being a constructive inteference as well accounting for the lost energy, I suppose it would come down to an issue of time; so if you experimentally arranged it so that the waves inteferred deconstructively first, what has happened to the energy at that point in time, before the constructive superposition occurs? And in terms of negative energy, I thought a system could only be said to have negative energy when it's doing work.
 
In most wave iteractions the energy is transferred between two different modes. While one mode experiances a minimun the other is at a maximum. The modes of an Electromagnetic field are the electric field and the magnetic field. So while you are obseving a phenomena miniumn related to the electric field at the same time and same point in space the magnetic field is experianceing a maximum. So destructive interferance for one will be constructive for the other.
 
Wot about when it isn't transferred between different modes?
 
Long ago, like in the 60's, I read about an experiment where a beam of neutrons from a reactor was made to interfere destructively with itself. And according to the article the neutrons did cease to exist. And I too wondered, what happened to their mass energy?
 
Energy is so nebulous a concept that it never bugged me when deconstructive interference occurred. But that neutrons do sometimes cease to exist when acting like waves, I find that baffling.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
10K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K