Register to reply

A confusion from David tong's notes on QFT

by kof9595995
Tags: confusion, david, notes, tong
Share this thread:
Jan29-11, 07:21 AM
P: 679
On page 59, in deriving 3.48, from the first step to the second step, why can we just insert |0><0| like that?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Team finds elusive quantum transformations near absolute zero
Scientists control surface tension to manipulate liquid metals (w/ Video)
Jan29-11, 05:49 PM
P: 194
He didn't just insert |0><0|. He's applying Wick's theorem, and his contractions correlations in the |0> state.
Jan30-11, 08:48 AM
P: 679
It's already normal ordered, so I don't think he applied Wick's theorem. And I still don't see why we can insert |0><0|.

Jan30-11, 01:35 PM
P: 644
A confusion from David tong's notes on QFT

I just took a quick look and I'm not sure about his conventions, but from the conventions I'm used to here is my reasoning:

The expression [tex] : \psi_1^\dagger \psi_1 \psi_2^\dagger \psi_2 : [/tex] is normal ordered. So in any terms in the creation/annihilation-operator expansion of this, all annihilation operators act on the state to the right before any creation operators do.

Since the incoming state on the right contains two particles and no anti-particles, the only contribution from this comes from terms where there are two particle annihilation operators (no anti-particle annihilation operators). This comes only from the [tex] \psi [/tex], not the [tex] \psi^\dagger[/tex].

The only possible result from the particle annihilation operators acting on the right is the vacuum state. Therefore he can factorize as he does, and put in |0><0| in the middle.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
QFT Video Lectures with David Tong Physics Learning Materials 1
David Berlinski Science & Math Textbooks 0
David Gross: String confusion Beyond the Standard Model 7
David Hawkins Science & Math Textbooks 1
Tong Zuo de Ni (You, the one whom sat next to me) General Discussion 2