Register to reply

Tunneling and transmission coefficient

by Sacroiliac
Tags: coefficient, transmission, tunneling
Share this thread:
Aug10-03, 10:09 PM
P: 13
If an ensemble of quantum partcles, with energy E, traveling in x direction encounter a very wide potential barrier V0 > E, the ensemble wavefunction will exponentially decay within the barrier.

I thought that meant that there was a small probability of detecting an electron within the barrier. But the reflection coefficient of the probability current is unity. So what’s going on here?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
Physical constant is constant even in strong gravitational fields
Physicists provide new insights into the world of quantum materials
Nuclear spins control current in plastic LED: Step toward quantum computing, spintronic memory, better displays
Aug10-03, 11:49 PM
futz's Avatar
P: 82
For a very wide barrier, the inverse if the transmission coefficient (T) goes to infinity, so T --> 0 and R --> 1, like you said. The probabilty density of the wavefunction does decay exponentially within the barrier, but the amplitude decreases as the width of the barrier increases. So, for a very wide barrier, the probability amplitude inside the barrier would be extrememly small. If we take the extreme case where R = 1, then the probability amplitude would basically be zero.

Here is a Shockwave movie that might help. Modify the width, and watch the behavior of the probability density.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Transmission Coefficient Advanced Physics Homework 1
Calculating velocity coefficient of arbitrary transmission lines? General Physics 2
Given: coefficient kinetic and coefficient static frictions Introductory Physics Homework 2
Probability in quantum tunneling Quantum Physics 0
Low coefficient vs. high coefficient of kinetic friction General Physics 2