Register to reply

Tunneling and transmission coefficient

by Sacroiliac
Tags: coefficient, transmission, tunneling
Share this thread:
Aug10-03, 10:09 PM
P: 13
If an ensemble of quantum partcles, with energy E, traveling in x direction encounter a very wide potential barrier V0 > E, the ensemble wavefunction will exponentially decay within the barrier.

I thought that meant that there was a small probability of detecting an electron within the barrier. But the reflection coefficient of the probability current is unity. So what’s going on here?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on
A new, tunable device for spintronics
Watching the structure of glass under pressure
New imaging technique shows how cocaine shuts down blood flow in mouse brains
Aug10-03, 11:49 PM
futz's Avatar
P: 82
For a very wide barrier, the inverse if the transmission coefficient (T) goes to infinity, so T --> 0 and R --> 1, like you said. The probabilty density of the wavefunction does decay exponentially within the barrier, but the amplitude decreases as the width of the barrier increases. So, for a very wide barrier, the probability amplitude inside the barrier would be extrememly small. If we take the extreme case where R = 1, then the probability amplitude would basically be zero.

Here is a Shockwave movie that might help. Modify the width, and watch the behavior of the probability density.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Transmission Coefficient Advanced Physics Homework 1
Calculating velocity coefficient of arbitrary transmission lines? General Physics 2
Given: coefficient kinetic and coefficient static frictions Introductory Physics Homework 2
Probability in quantum tunneling Quantum Physics 0
Low coefficient vs. high coefficient of kinetic friction General Physics 2