
#1
Feb111, 02:02 PM

P: 3

Banging my head against a wall trying to prove to a coworker why the square root of three shows up in a threephase voltage drop calculation...any ideas?




#2
Feb111, 04:01 PM

PF Gold
P: 322

The voltage at VAB comprises of VA  VB (which are equal in magnitude):
VAB = VA  VB = V@0  V@120 = V [1@0  1@120] V [1@0  1@120] = V [cos(0) + jsin(0)  {cos(120) + jsin(120)}] = V [1  cos(120) + jsin(120)] V [1  cos(120) + jsin(120)] = V [1 + 1/2 +j sqrt(3)/2] = V [ 3/2 + j sqrt(3)/2] V [ 3/2 + j sqrt(3)/2] = V [sqrt(3)@30] Therefore the Voltage between A & B is sqrt(3) the magnitude of either A or B and is 30 degrees out of phase. 



#3
Feb111, 04:12 PM

P: 3

Thanks Zryn, however, I'm still not clear how that implies the voltage drop on a threephase load involves the Sqrt(3). After all, there is no return load on a balanced threephase load, and thus why would one consider linetoline voltages? It just seems to me that considering any one of the three phase conductors at a given voltage (say 120V) would result in a voltage drop of V=IZ where Z is the impedance of the conductor and I being the motor's draw. I'm not convinced yet :(




#4
Feb111, 04:44 PM

PF Gold
P: 322

Why the Square Root of 3 in 3Phase Voltage Drops?
If you have a 'Delta' connection the line and phase voltages are the same, so I'll assume you have a 'Wye' connection.
In a 'Wye' connection VA (line) = sqrt(3) VAB (phase), so when you say V = IZ and you are talking about a single conductor, do you mean V/sqrt(3) = IZ? 



#5
Feb111, 04:56 PM

P: 3

That's the thing!!! It doesn't matter. You look up any 3phase voltage drop calculator and they do not discern between Delta or Wye connected loads or sources.




#6
Feb211, 04:01 PM

PF Gold
P: 322

Do you have a link to the specific calculator you are using? They are probably just using certain assumptions which validate the result.




#7
Feb1712, 07:40 PM

PF Gold
P: 369

"After all, there is no return load on a balanced threephase load, and thus why would one consider linetoline voltages?"
on a 3 phase system, phase b is phase a return, phase c is phase b return, and phase a is phase c return. The voltages are different line to line than line to neutral because of the proof than zyrn posted. So there are in fact cases where the line to line voltages are important... i.e. any load connected between two or even three phases? 



#8
Mar1612, 05:31 PM

PF Gold
P: 369

sorry to bump this old thread but wait...
Shouldn't voltage Vab be the sum of the two phase voltages Va and Vb, not the difference as Zyrn suggests??? is it really Vab = VaVb, that would suggest The difference between A and B is smaller than Va to ground, which isn't the case, because Vab is obviously 1.73 times larger... So the proof works, but it isn't correct, is it? Can someone please set me straight here? 



#9
Mar1712, 03:12 PM

P: 136

Yes, Zyrn is right. Voltage is potential _difference_, hence the subtraction. If you know phasor notation/diagram (similar to vectors), look here:
http://www.electronicstutorials.ws/...uits/acp50.gif Where Vab is an phasor with arrow at Va, and tail at Vb. Hence Vab=VaVb (normal vector subtraction/addition) 



#10
Mar1712, 03:15 PM

PF Gold
P: 369

that link does not work for me.
Yeah, I drew the circuit, Vab is a vector whos head is at a , tails at b. Current flows from a, returns on b so voltage is dropped across a and b in the opposite direction as Vab?... therefore its the sums of Va and Vb that make up Vab? Still not getting this 



#11
Mar1712, 03:18 PM

PF Gold
P: 369

is the volt drop on Va opposite with respect to the volt drop on Vb?
I mean current only flows in one direction through the two phases, That is why I have trouble seeing how it could be the DIFFERENCE of the voltages Hmm... I think I might get it now. Maybe Va and Vb are opposite. 



#12
Feb2513, 10:55 PM

P: 1

Don't mean to dredge this up from the past, but I think you've got the vector addition incorrect.
Vab = (Va) + Vb = Vb  Va As was stated earlier, Vab is a voltage phasor (or vector) whose tail is at "a" and whose head is at "b", thus meaning phasor from "a" to "b". To traverse this vector path one has to go backwards along Va (hence the minus) and then forwards along Vb, this leads to the minus sign when the rearrangement is done as above. Regards Darryl 



#13
Feb2613, 04:00 AM

Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 11,383

The reason for the "Root Three" turning up is the trigonometry involved with the phasors. Your three phasors point from the origin in three directions, separated by 120°. The potential between any two of these phasors is 2V_{0}Cos(60°), which is √3V_{0}. Draw out the vector diagram and work out the distance between the vertices of the triangle made up of the ends of the vectors.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Rootmeansquare voltage of the waveform  Advanced Physics Homework  8  
laurent series for square root of square root  Calculus  0  
square root and cube root question  Precalculus Mathematics Homework  4  
prove that of sum square root of 2 and square root of 3 is not rational  Calculus & Beyond Homework  15  
Proove that the cubic root of 2 + the square root of 2 is irrational  Calculus & Beyond Homework  4 