View Poll Results: How should we retire the Hubble?
Stick with the original plan & send up a shuttle. 5 45.45%
Keep it in orbit (maintenance missions). 4 36.36%
Let it burn up in the atmosphere. 0 0%
Other, 2 18.18%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

Register to reply

How should we retire the Hubble?

by Phobos
Tags: hubble, retire
Share this thread:
Phobos
#1
Aug11-03, 11:38 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,021
I heard this question on a radio talk show.

The original plan was to send up another shuttle mission to retrieve the Hubble so that it could be displayed in the Smithsonian Musuem. But with the Challanger and Columbia accidents behind us, do you think the risk is worth it? What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Eclipsing binary stars discovered by high school students
Swirling electrons in the whirlpool galaxy
A spectacular landscape of star formation
Tyger
#2
Aug11-03, 01:11 PM
Tyger's Avatar
P: 402
I think we should make a special re-entry vehicle that we can use to bring things back and make sure it's large enough to handle the Hubble. We could also use it to return other payloads for refurbishing.
FZ+
#3
Aug11-03, 08:00 PM
FZ+'s Avatar
P: 1,954
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?

Maybe it can just be sold to another space consortium.

selfAdjoint
#4
Aug11-03, 10:54 PM
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 8,147
How should we retire the Hubble?

Send it glorously into the sun!
russ_watters
#5
Aug11-03, 11:42 PM
Mentor
P: 22,286
Originally posted by FZ+
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?
Or how much it costs to bring it back to earth? (about half a billion).
jeff
#6
Aug12-03, 11:34 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 660
Originally posted by Phobos
What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?
Just before it's "performance" period is over, attempt to make little telescope babies by flying hubble straight into the giant radio telescope at arecibo chile.
Eh
#7
Aug12-03, 01:13 PM
P: 683
That was funny.

But humor aside, the Hubble is actually a piece of technology that stands out among all time human accomplishments. It's a statement about the progress of the entire human race. If anything deserves to be in a museum, the Hubble is it.
FZ+
#8
Aug12-03, 01:13 PM
FZ+'s Avatar
P: 1,954
Seriously though, if it costs that much, it is more worthwhile spending the cash where it is really needed - other NASA projects, than on little moments of sentimentality. That would be a better celebration of what the telescope acheived. It's just a machine for god's sake...
Shadow
#9
Aug12-03, 01:53 PM
P: 120
I think they should stick with the original plan.
I, Brian
#10
Aug13-03, 07:42 AM
P: n/a
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Send it glorously into the sun!
My thoughts entirely. :)
kleinma
#11
Aug14-03, 01:12 PM
kleinma's Avatar
P: 91
I think they should give it to me.. it will be much better than my 8 inch dob
Phobos
#12
Aug18-03, 09:07 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,021
CNN finally picked up on the topic...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Where i want to retire General Discussion 3
I just wanted to say i retire from physics investigation General Discussion 25
Sandra Day O'Connor to Retire From Supreme Court Current Events 23
What are you going to do when you retire? General Discussion 23
Where would you like to retire or purchase a vacation home? General Discussion 20