View Poll Results: How should we retire the Hubble?
Stick with the original plan & send up a shuttle. 5 45.45%
Keep it in orbit (maintenance missions). 4 36.36%
Let it burn up in the atmosphere. 0 0%
Other, 2 18.18%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

How should we retire the Hubble?


by Phobos
Tags: hubble, retire
Phobos
Phobos is offline
#1
Aug11-03, 11:38 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,018
I heard this question on a radio talk show.

The original plan was to send up another shuttle mission to retrieve the Hubble so that it could be displayed in the Smithsonian Musuem. But with the Challanger and Columbia accidents behind us, do you think the risk is worth it? What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?
Phys.Org News Partner Astronomy news on Phys.org
Quest for extraterrestrial life not over, experts say
Continents may be a key feature of Super-Earths
Astronomers discover first self-lensing binary star system
Tyger
Tyger is offline
#2
Aug11-03, 01:11 PM
Tyger's Avatar
P: 402
I think we should make a special re-entry vehicle that we can use to bring things back and make sure it's large enough to handle the Hubble. We could also use it to return other payloads for refurbishing.
FZ+
FZ+ is offline
#3
Aug11-03, 08:00 PM
FZ+'s Avatar
P: 1,954
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?

Maybe it can just be sold to another space consortium.

selfAdjoint
selfAdjoint is offline
#4
Aug11-03, 10:54 PM
Emeritus
PF Gold
P: 8,147

How should we retire the Hubble?


Send it glorously into the sun!
russ_watters
russ_watters is offline
#5
Aug11-03, 11:42 PM
Mentor
P: 21,999
Originally posted by FZ+
Erm... does anyone have figures on how much yearly maintenance of Hubble costs?
Or how much it costs to bring it back to earth? (about half a billion).
jeff
jeff is offline
#6
Aug12-03, 11:34 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 660
Originally posted by Phobos
What should be done once the Hubble's performance period is over (a few years from now)?
Just before it's "performance" period is over, attempt to make little telescope babies by flying hubble straight into the giant radio telescope at arecibo chile.
Eh
Eh is offline
#7
Aug12-03, 01:13 PM
P: 683
That was funny. [:D]

But humor aside, the Hubble is actually a piece of technology that stands out among all time human accomplishments. It's a statement about the progress of the entire human race. If anything deserves to be in a museum, the Hubble is it.
FZ+
FZ+ is offline
#8
Aug12-03, 01:13 PM
FZ+'s Avatar
P: 1,954
Seriously though, if it costs that much, it is more worthwhile spending the cash where it is really needed - other NASA projects, than on little moments of sentimentality. That would be a better celebration of what the telescope acheived. It's just a machine for god's sake...
Shadow
Shadow is offline
#9
Aug12-03, 01:53 PM
P: 120
I think they should stick with the original plan.
I, Brian
#10
Aug13-03, 07:42 AM
P: n/a
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Send it glorously into the sun!
My thoughts entirely. :)
kleinma
kleinma is offline
#11
Aug14-03, 01:12 PM
kleinma's Avatar
P: 91
I think they should give it to me.. it will be much better than my 8 inch dob
Phobos
Phobos is offline
#12
Aug18-03, 09:07 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
P: 2,018
CNN finally picked up on the topic...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html
[:D]


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Where i want to retire General Discussion 3
i just wanted to say i retire from physics investigation General Discussion 25
Sandra Day O'Connor to Retire From Supreme Court Current Events 23
What are you going to do when you retire? General Discussion 23
Where would you like to retire or purchase a vacation home? General Discussion 20