Estimating Kinetic Friction Coefficient of Jet-Powered Car

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves estimating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a jet-powered car based on its skid marks and initial speed. The context is rooted in physics, specifically in the areas of dynamics and friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the work-energy theorem and the relationship between kinetic energy and work done by friction. There are attempts to clarify the role of mass in the equations and how to relate the forces acting on the car to the problem at hand.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using energy conservation principles to approach the problem, while others express concern about the lack of mass information, which complicates their calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not provide the mass of the car, which is a significant constraint in their calculations. There is also an assumption that drag is negligible.

envscigrl
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:
When the jet-powered car "Spirit of America" went out of control during a test drive at Bonnevile Salt Flats, Utah, it left skid marks about 18.70km long. If the car was moving initially at a speed of 661.0km/hr, estimate the coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the road.

I know that the coefficient of kinetic friction can be found using the equation:
fk = u * N where u is the coefficient and N the normal force. But I cannot understand how I am supposed to find it with only the speed and distance. I tried finding the time (assuming V=0) then finding the acceleration and them finding the force with F=ma. But I was unsure if the f in the f=ma equation was equal to the f in the f=uN equation.

P.S.(I have converted the distance to meters (18700) and speed to m/s (186.618))
Thanks for your help and time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume the engine shut down as soon as trouble occurred. Furthermore, you'll have to assume that drag is zero (unless this is given to you). Draw a FBD. What forces are acting on the car and in which directions? Once you know the forces and how they are working with relation to the direction of motion you can use the work/energy theorem to figure out how much work is done by the forces slowing the car down in order to dissipate the energy of a car going 187 m/s. Where you also given the mass of the car?

Anyway, good luck.
 
No the problem did not supply a mass that is what is tripping me up on the problem. If I had the mass it would be much much easier.
 
Energy is certainly a way to solve this problem. If the car had a Kinetic Energy of (1/2)mv^2 and this was completely dissipated over some distance, you can figure through conservation of energy that all of the KE went into work as described by the work equation W = Fd (force times distance).

Ah, but we don't have mass! Well, let's just keep going to see how things turn out. Start out by saying
[tex]KE = W[/tex]
so...
[tex]\frac 1 2 m v^2 = Fd[/tex]
Now, what is this F in the right hand side (i.e. what creates this force and what is our formula for it?) In your first post you said you already knew that the force slowing down the car was the force of friction. The formula for this is:
[tex]F_{fric} = \mu N[/tex]
Now, [itex]\mu[/itex] is what the question asks you to find, what about N? What is it based on? Find an expression for N, plug it into the frictional force equation, then plug that equation in for the force in our first relation and you might see some ways to simplify (i.e. cancel) a certain variable.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
973