Figuring acceleration using time and the reading of a weight scale help please

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating acceleration using weight scale readings in an elevator scenario. The original poster describes a situation where a student records scale readings over time, initially at 500 N and then at 700 N, and seeks to determine the acceleration during these intervals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Newton's second law (F=ma) to find acceleration but expresses uncertainty about their calculations. Some participants clarify that mass should be used instead of weight in the calculations. Others suggest using free-body diagrams to better understand the forces at play.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the problem, with some providing guidance on the correct application of formulas and the importance of considering net forces. There is a mix of approaches being discussed, particularly regarding how to account for gravitational force in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining the direction of forces and how this affects the calculation of acceleration. There is also mention of the need to clarify the relationship between weight, mass, and gravitational acceleration.

benji
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I'm new to this stuff, so the question may be really simple, but I just can't work it right...

Alright, so the question I'm trying to figure is this:

The student's normal weight is 500 N. He stands on a scale in an elevator and records the scale reading as a function of time.

So for the first 5 seconds the scale is at 500 N, thus the acceleration is 0 m/s/s. Then the next 5 seconds the scale reading is at 700. Now how do I go about figuring the acceleration?

I know F=ma. The only way I could think of solving this problem is putting the difference in for the force variable, the students weight in for the mass variable and then solving for acceleration.

So for example for the second 5 seconds I used 200=500a and I got 0.4 m/s/s. This doesn't seem like the right answer so I must be missing something or just going about the problem completely the wrong way. If someone could point me in the right direction I'd really appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have it mostly right, the 'm' in the equation is the student's mass, not weight. weight = mass*gravity.
 
500/9.8 = 700/x

Cross multiply, solve for x, subtract g, and that is your acceleration upward.
 
ek said:
500/9.8 = 700/x

Cross multiply, solve for x, subtract g, and that is your acceleration upward.

If I did it this way I do 500/9.8=700/x and x=13.72m/s/s. But then the last 5 seconds of the boys motion is downward and the scale reads 200N (300N0 lighter (when he was going up in the second 5 seconds the scale was 200N heavier [700N]). When I do 500/9.8=300/x I get x=5.88m/s/s. That doesn't seem right... So I assume I add 5.88m/s/s to gravity, then I get 15.68m/s/s.

...is that correct?
 
No. You are using the formula [itex]F_{net}=ma[/itex], meaning the net force is accounted for (including gravity). You should really be starting all these problems with a free-body diagram, BTW.

Review your work with this in mind and remember that your final answer should be negative because you defined the upward direction as positive.
 
benji said:
If I did it this way I do 500/9.8=700/x and x=13.72m/s/s. But then the last 5 seconds of the boys motion is downward and the scale reads 200N (300N0 lighter (when he was going up in the second 5 seconds the scale was 200N heavier [700N]). When I do 500/9.8=300/x I get x=5.88m/s/s. That doesn't seem right... So I assume I add 5.88m/s/s to gravity, then I get 15.68m/s/s.

...is that correct?
Your first part is right. 13.72 - 9.8 is the acceleration.

For the second part, since it's the opposite direction, you subtract that number from 9.8, instead of the other way around, to get the acceleration downwards. In this case it would be 9.8-5.88=3.92 m/s^2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K