Thread Closed

reliability of Mathematica

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Oct14-04, 07:35 AM   #1
 
Question

reliability of Mathematica


Hi,
Recently I was doing some calculations with Mathematica then I did it on paper and the results weren't the same. I am almost sure I didn't make any mistake. I study electrical engineering and we have to do a lot of calculations. I have used Matlab and Mathematica for calculations with symbols. Until now I haven't done much complex calculations with Mathematica. Does anyone know if Mathematica is 100% reliable for every equation or is it only a tool for simple equations?
Regards,
Niko
 
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Hong Kong launches first electric taxis
>> Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt
>> Galaxy's Ring of Fire
Oct14-04, 12:06 PM   #2
 
In short, yes, it is correct 100% of the time I would say. If it wasn't there would be no use for it. I use it all the time and it can out-math pretty much anything out there, it is a computer program after all, its job is to do math calculations.
 
Oct14-04, 12:10 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
I haven't used Mathematica very much but I've never had Maple screw up and I'd wager Mathematica is quite reliable.

There is a disclaimer though, these programs will be able to reliably perform any computation that you tell them to perform. Make sure you're actually telling it to do what you think you're telling it to do. They aren't free of user error.
 
Oct14-04, 01:12 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

reliability of Mathematica


Mathematica, MATLAB, and other CA systems will sometimes disagree when doing really, really intensive tensor-calc problems with lots of ODEs. The ODE solvers are not always perfect, but are, well, virtually always right.

If you're doing some simple EE work, and your pencil-and-paper solution doesn't match Mathematica's solution, it's almost surely your error. Check your pencil-and-paper work, then check to make sure you accurately supplied the problem to Mathematica.

- Warren
 
Oct14-04, 01:43 PM   #5
 
They wouldn't release it if they knew that it wasn't 100% reliable. Even if it was 99%, I doubt they would.

I think you may have done something wrong when you did it on paper. Double check it.
 
Oct14-04, 05:29 PM   #6
 
Thank you.
Maybe the result isn't different but it isn't simplified. I am sure I haven't done any error with my calculations.
Something that also seems strange is that Mathematica gave the result in note like this:
Sqrt[a^2......] I have put FullSimplify command but it hasn't changed. Anyone knows why?
 
Oct14-04, 06:33 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
You might want to use an ExpandAll followed by a FullSimplify.

- Warren
 
Oct15-04, 03:39 AM   #8
 
It still doesn't work.
I get this result:
Sqrt[a^2*Cosh[x]^2*Sin[y]^2]
 
Thread Closed
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: reliability of Mathematica
Thread Forum Replies
Formula to decide reliability of data Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 0
non-dependent reliability Precalculus Mathematics Homework 2
help about reliability of a compressor General Engineering 7
Probabilty of reliability and the failure rate General Math 1
reliability of this website General Discussion 4