Quantum Uncertainty vs. Universal Properties of Particles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of electrons when placed in separate identical boxes and observed. It explores concepts related to quantum mechanics, specifically the implications of measurement, entanglement, and the uncertainty principle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether observing two electrons in separate boxes would yield identical results, suggesting that experimental error could affect outcomes.
  • Another participant asserts that if the same experiment is conducted in both boxes, the results should be consistent, but emphasizes that different types of measurements could lead to different interpretations of the particles' identities.
  • A subsequent post raises the question of whether the electrons could be considered entangled based on the experimental setup.
  • A later reply clarifies that the consistency of results does not imply entanglement, noting that the quantum mechanics framework remains valid under the assumption of degenerate eigenvalues.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of measurement and the concept of entanglement, indicating that multiple competing interpretations exist without a consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on the uncertainty principle and the conditions under which measurements can be made, but does not resolve the implications of these concepts in relation to the identity of particles.

Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
If we have two electrons. Now put each one of them in a separate identical box and observe their properties, and collect as much information as possible, would you have obtain an identical result?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Hyperreality
If we have two electrons. Now put each one of them in a separate identical box and observe their properties, and collect as much information as possible, would you have obtain an identical result?

If you do the same experiment in each of the boxes you should get the same results, within the limits of experimental error.

What you cannot do is measure the position or energy of the particle in one box and the momentum or duration in the other, and then claim to have evaded the uncertainty principle. If the particles experience different measurements they will no longer be considered identical.
 
If you do the same experiment in each of the boxes you should get the same results, within the limits of experimental error.

Does this mean that the two electrons are entangled?
 
Originally posted by Hyperreality
Does this mean that the two electrons are entangled?

Certainly not. It just means QM is consistent. I am here assuming an experiment where the eigenvalues are degenerate, so the observable has a definite value. If you have many eigenvaues the different boxes could show different results. But there is no link between the boxes.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Undergrad Can the "same" particle be used in different experiments?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Glueballs Observed For The First Time
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Undergrad New Upper Bound of Neutrino Mass
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Undergrad Best way to focus charged particles back to their source?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Undergrad Progress In Calculating The HLbL Contribution To Muon g-2
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Graduate Question about data & Monte Carlo statistical uncertainties
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Uncertainty Principle in QFT & Early Universe Conditions
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Undergrad New muon g-2 calculation consistent with experiment
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
High School When to think of PE as property of a system vs of a particle
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K