|Mar9-11, 01:00 PM||#1|
Friction vs. Applied force
So my lecturer asked a physics audience (final year and postgrad) this question and no one got it right (at first):
Consider a block pushed back and forth on a flat table. Draw a graph of the applied force vs. friction. Take a minute to figure this one out yourself, then click this link for his solution.
Trouble I'm having is interpreting the two lines, because it implies on the x-intercept that you will have a positive acceleration when there is no applied force, so the resultant force must be friction - which cannot exist without an applied force!
|Mar9-11, 01:25 PM||#2|
Blog Entries: 5
|Mar9-11, 04:12 PM||#3|
Now I see that the title is actually "friction vs. applied force".
This makes more sense.
As you increase the applied force from zero, the friction will be equal with the applied force until the body starts to move. Then it will remain constant. So the first portion of the graph F vs Friction will be a line at 45 degrees from either axis. Then it will be a horizontal line.
|Similar Threads for: Friction vs. Applied force|
|Newton's Law: Angled applied force and friction||Introductory Physics Homework||0|
|Applied Force ,Kinetic Friction, Static Friction involving two stacked masses||Introductory Physics Homework||9|
|Calculate acceleration of object with applied force and friction||Introductory Physics Homework||2|
|Finding force of friction with only applied force and acceleration given?||Introductory Physics Homework||1|
|a quick question about friction and applied force||Introductory Physics Homework||4|