Cauchy Riemann Conditions Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Cauchy-Riemann conditions, which are essential for the differentiability of complex functions. The conditions state that for a function w(z) = u(x,y) + iv(x,y), the derivatives must satisfy du/dx = dv/dy and du/dy = -dv/dx. While the gradient squared of both u and v is discussed, it is clarified that they are not necessarily equal, as the Cauchy-Riemann conditions only relate the first-order partial derivatives, not the second-order derivatives. The Laplacian of both u and v is confirmed to be zero, indicating that they are harmonic functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their differentiability
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and their notation
  • Knowledge of harmonic functions and the Laplacian operator
  • Basic principles of complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann conditions in complex analysis
  • Learn about harmonic functions and their properties
  • Explore the concept of the Laplacian in multiple dimensions
  • Investigate examples of analytic functions and their real and imaginary parts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on complex analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify the relationship between the Cauchy-Riemann conditions and harmonic functions.

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Ok, I am told in a complex analysis book that the gradient squared of u is equal to the gradient squared of v which is equal to 0.

We know the derivate of w exists, and w(z)=u(x,y) + iv(x,y)

Thus the Cauchy Riemann conditions must hold. (When I use d assume that it refers to a partial derivative)

So du/dx=dv/dy and du/dy=-dv/dx by Cauchy Riemann

We know the gradient squared of u is equal to d^2u/dx^2 + d^2u/dy^2 is equal to d^2v/dy^2 - d^2v/dx^2

We know the gradient squared of v is equal to d^2v/dx^2 + d^2v/dy^2 which is equal to d^2u/dx^2 - d^2u/dy^2

Am I correct in assuming this? And if I am, I don't see how the gradient squared of u is equal to the gradient squared of v. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cauchy-Riemann conditions:
(a) du/dx= dv/dy and (b) du/dy= - dv/dx

Differentiate both sides of (a) with respect to x:
d2/dx2= d2v/dydx

Differentiate both sides of (b) with respect to y:
d2u/dy2= -d2v/dydx

Adding: d2/dx2+ d2u/dy2= d2v/dydx -d2v/dydx= 0.

Differentiate (a) with respect to y and (b) with respect to x and subtract to get the formula for v.

The "Laplacian" (what you are calling "gradient squared") of u and v are not just equal, they are both 0. The real and imaginary parts of an analytic function are always "harmonic functions", i.e. they satisfy
[itex]\Delta u=0[/itex] and [itex]\Delta v= 0[/itex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Yes, you are correct in assuming that the Cauchy Riemann conditions must hold for a complex function to be differentiable. The Cauchy Riemann conditions state that the partial derivatives of the real and imaginary parts of a complex function must satisfy certain equations, which you have correctly stated as du/dx=dv/dy and du/dy=-dv/dx.

However, it is important to note that the gradient squared of u and the gradient squared of v are not necessarily equal. The Cauchy Riemann conditions only guarantee that the partial derivatives of u and v are related in a specific way, but they do not necessarily determine the values of the second order partial derivatives of u and v.

In fact, the equations you have written for the gradient squared of u and v are not necessarily true. They only hold if the second order partial derivatives of u and v are equal, but this is not always the case. So while the Cauchy Riemann conditions are necessary for a function to be differentiable, they are not sufficient to determine the values of the second order partial derivatives.

I hope this helps clarify your understanding of the Cauchy Riemann conditions and their relationship to the gradient squared of u and v.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K