Detailed problem I did need verification

  • Thread starter Thread starter mad
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a system of pulleys and masses, specifically focusing on calculating the acceleration of the system. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks verification from others.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the pulley system's configuration, questioning the assumptions about the ideal nature of the pulleys and the assignment of mass to the combined group referred to as M3. There are also inquiries about the correctness of the formulas used by the original poster.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen various interpretations of the problem setup, with some participants offering insights into the mechanics involved. While the original poster indicated they found the answer, there remains a lack of consensus on the details of the calculations and assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the clarity of the problem due to the original poster's translation from French and the link to the problem image being problematic at times. The constraints of the homework context and the nature of the problem setup are also under discussion.

mad
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Hello all,
I need to find the acceleration of this system. I did all the calculations but I'm stuck at the end and I'm pretty sure I did something wrong.. Could someone verify this? I just scanned the paper I'm working on. Also, sorry if I don't use the same signs you use, I'm translating this from french.
PS: The teacher told me I can group pulley2 and mass2 so that's what I called M3

Thanks a lot


http://img99.exs.cx/img99/5910/Picture61.jpg
Click to enlarge

I recommend you save it and scale down the zoom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry that there's something wrong with your picture's link...
 
It surprised me a lot, when I read you use the same notation as me, but then I learn you translated from french and here in spain we use all the same things :)

But let's get up with this stuck problem...

I don't know if the pulley is also ideal, so the tension [tex]\vec{\tau}[/tex] is the same in both sides of the pulley. I believe that my assumption is correct.

Also, I think that your problem is that you assigned M3 to the pully and the mass 2, but you can't imagine it properly. The difference between this case and the Atwood's one is that the mass at left is connected to a fixed point. Simply, you can imagine that the weight of the group you called M3 is the sum of the weight of mass 2 and pully 2 minus the tension which supports this group. Imagine you would build the problem. If the system is very massive, it can break the pully one unless you help it, and fixing the rope is just this, helping the rope 1 not to support so much tension, so coming back to the main problem, you can rest the tension to the weight, in module, so your problem may be transformed to atwood's one.

I didn't do any kind of calculus to reply this post, Newtonian mechanics are very boring after you learn hamilton ones, so something that I said may be wrong. I don't think so, but ... can be.

MiGUi
 
The left pulley and the mass2 can move. There is only pulley 1 that cannot move.. I don't understand what you are trying to explain.. The 'group' M3 has a force downward (its weight) and two tensions. Also, the rope is ideal which means tension is the same. Are my formula at least right?
 
liaoge said:
I am sorry that there's something wrong with your picture's link...

It is working fine now
 
Nevermind. I found the answer. It is how I did it except I made a little mistake in the algebra. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K