New Reply

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants

 
Share Thread
Apr19-11, 10:47 PM   #4319
 

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants


Does anyone know about the use of hydrogen peroxide in BWR's during shutdown. I'm interested in storage (in or out of reactor building), added concentrations in reactor and SFP.

For example:

"Appropriate biocides (hydrogen peroxide) at concentrations up to 1000 ppm were added (to the pool water) to control biofouling."

From: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publica...e_0944_scr.pdf

Also anyone with knowledge about what chemicals might be stored/used (in or near reactor) during BWR shutdown that might interact with hydrogen peroxide (powerful oxidizer).

I have a feeling that hydrogen peroxide may have played a role in the explosion at the Fukushima Diiachi #4 reactor building.
Apr19-11, 10:55 PM   #4320
I_P
 
Quote by etudiant View Post
The expertise deployed on this forum to understand the processes which reduced four multi billion dollar reactors to steaming scrap is laudable.
For an outside observer, it would be wonderful if this expertise were also employed looking forward, to help evaluate and understand the challenges and risks posed by the clean up plan.
For instance, Areva is scheduled to have a water processing plant built by the end of June that will process 1200 tons of water/day. There are nearly 70,000 tons currently in the facility, increasing at 500tons/day, so there will be 100,000 tons by the time the plant is operational.
The plant will start to whittle down the flood at about 700 tons/day net once it starts, so it will take 150 days to drain the facility, if all goes well.
That says the cleanup will not begin until very late this year at the earliest.
Is this a plausible schedule? How does it tie into the TEPCO indication that the immediate crisis should be stabilized within 9 months? What are the risks that should be of most concern?
My assessment, FWIW, is that TEPCO was mandated by the government to come up with a plan - so they have, in consultation with experts in and outside of Japan. Given what they know about the state of affairs, the plan is a reasonable place to start. However, working against them are: they don't yet appear to have a clear idea of the state of damage to the reactors (and the four units each have different problems). High radiation levels remain an obstacle to good assessment and will hamper remediation efforts. They really need access by workers to execute the cooling plan; There is a continuing threat of more aftershocks causing further damage and complications; failure of the cooling system now in place could lead to additional release of radiation and change the ground rules; because the state of damage is unknown there is always the possibility that, despite the current appearance of stability, processes at work in the reactors and fuel storage areas could lead to currently unrecognized problems.

This article from Asahi lays some of it out:
http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201104190193.html

I would also say that the nuclear power community as a whole does not have a clear idea of how to proceed with so many unknowns - the problems faced are quite difficult and appropriate tools and procedures are lacking. Look at the debate on the pool chemistry taking place here and elsewhere - its all a 'grand' experiment - both fascinating and terrible at the same time.
Apr19-11, 10:56 PM   #4321
 
Quote by OnlyOneTruth View Post
Chronology also contains links to documentation of security audits, the second PDF on http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/pres.../bi8a07-j.html is an appendix to a 2008 audit of No4 with loads of data and some visual documentation. I'll add two thumbs as a teaser:
The first one is a suppression chamber strainer that they replaced.
The second one is inspected points on the jet pumps that are arrayed around the outside of the shroud.

Looks like they found a leaking fuel assembly. See page 26:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/pres...a/bi8a09-j.pdf

Would something like that have been left in the SFP after replacement, or would it have been stored in isolation somewhere else?
Apr19-11, 11:04 PM   #4322
 
Quote by Dmytry View Post
it is impossible to predict anything there imo. I would of never thought they'd be using 2 robots, one with radiation monitor strapped to it, other to look at the monitor, 38 days in, versus some KHG robot.
Especially this being Japan.
I mean look at that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFVlzUAZkHY

I can't figure out how they suddenly seem to be a 3rd world country in terms of technology.
Apr19-11, 11:23 PM   #4323
 
Quote by ascot317 View Post
Especially this being Japan.
I mean look at that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFVlzUAZkHY

I can't figure out how they suddenly seem to be a 3rd world country in terms of technology.
article from 2000:
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-b...0000413b5.html
they cancelled the project within a year under notion that they don't need that.
Both Germany and France offered robots ages ago.
Apr19-11, 11:23 PM   #4324
 
I am quite a few pages behind, but before I go to bed, I wanted to ask to see if I am out in left field with a broken mitt.

TEPCO is still pouring water into the top of Reactor Two. Days ago there was steam flowing out to assure us that the reactor core was being cooled.

Now, the water is not reaching the core as no steam is being generated, but hot gases are erupting from the reactor as if it was a volcano.

Dudes, is this the beginning of a China Syndrome situation. Where the 'ell is the core? Maybe somebody has already answered this, if the water always seeks lowest ground and the core is going down as it melts what else could be happening? The Core went right and the water is going left or vice versa? How?

Is the core in the earth under the plant and debris has fallen in on it and the water has flushed a path to the sea or some underground pocket.......
Apr19-11, 11:31 PM   #4325
 
i think core is in RPV cooking itself, and I think consequences of this may - in worst case - leave you wishing that it just melted through and mixed with some molten concrete etc, blown itself apart, or did something else that'd make it cook colder. I really have no idea into what fractions the corium is going to fractionally distillate itself, and I do not want to get educated on this topic by experimental data. I only know that the hotter fuel cooks, the more stuff gets out of it, and I estimate it can boil itself. Literally.
Apr20-11, 12:52 AM   #4326
 
From

Quote by artax View Post
don't know if the whole of this vid has been posted before?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLE2nA-0TBU
at about 51 seconds

Quote by artax View Post
image stabilised t-hawk video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7DF3teaj7M
at about 2:05



Why does it look like this?:



Notice how close the top of the reactor is to the outside wall in Mark I containment systems:



I have marked in red the part of the drywell that seems to have been blown away. But, if so, how?!!!
Apr20-11, 12:57 AM   #4327
 
Quote by MJRacer View Post
From



at about 51 seconds



at about 2:05



Why does it look like this?:



Notice how close the top of the reactor is to the outside wall in Mark I containment systems:



I have marked in red the part of the drywell that seems to have been blown away. But, if so, how?!!!
That is the control room, supposed to be at high SW corner of RB.
Apr20-11, 12:57 AM   #4328
 
Quote by Joe Neubarth View Post
Now, the water is not reaching the core as no steam is being generated, but hot gases are erupting from the reactor as if it was a volcano.
where did you see that , I must admit i no longer watch nhk 247 (especially since they resume regular program)
Apr20-11, 12:59 AM   #4329
 
Quote by MJRacer View Post
From



at about 51 seconds



at about 2:05

http://i55.tinypic.com/mskgid.png

Why does it look like this?:

http://i53.tinypic.com/2jcj1hd.jpg
Only that it doesn't look like this and is nowhere close to it. Look a few frames back and forth. The Drywell is >10m wide and round, the piece in the video isn't.
Apr20-11, 01:09 AM   #4330
 
Quote by MJRacer View Post
From
Why does it look like this?:
It does not, and it is not.
I can not be 100% positive that it is the floor control basement the only picture we have for this control room are from unit 3 an do not match
Apr20-11, 01:19 AM   #4331
 
Quote by hoyrylollaaja View Post
That is the control room, supposed to be at high SW corner of RB.
The object I have circled in red looks like it is round and does not appear to be in the corner, but away from both walls a certain distance.

Here is appears to be a picture of the control room:

Quote by |Fred View Post
where the floor control rooms gone ? supose to be in the south west corner but the remains do not seems to fit the structure
Apr20-11, 01:20 AM   #4332
 
Quote by ascot317 View Post
Only that it doesn't look like this and is nowhere close to it. Look a few frames back and forth. The Drywell is >10m wide and round, the piece in the video isn't.
Exactly. The drywell appears to be completely gone and it appears as if we are looking right at the stainless steel reactor vessel (sans yellow cap).
Apr20-11, 01:23 AM   #4333
 
Quote by MJRacer View Post
Exactly. The drywell appears to be completely gone and it appears as if we are looking right at the stainless steel reactor vessel (sans yellow cap).
No, not exactly. I'm saying your observation is wrong. This isn't a part of the drywell. And it's surely not a part of the pressure vessel. AND the yellow cap isn't part of the pressure vessel, either, it's part of the drywell/containment.
Apr20-11, 01:29 AM   #4334
 
Blog Entries: 2
Quote by MJRacer View Post
I have marked in red the part of the drywell that seems to have been blown away. But, if so, how?!!!
In your first picture you can see the drywell cap in the background (yellow). It is sitting on the floor of the refueling level in the reactor building. That floor is several meters above the top of the drywell cap when it's in place. There is no part of the reactor or drywell vessel high enough to block the view of the yellow cap when it's removed and on the floor.

As for the second and third pictures, at that point in construction the reactor vessel would not be in place yet. The middle picture shows the upper part of the drywell sticking up out of the construction site. Whatever the bulky thing in the top picture is, it's not part of the drywell or reactor vessel.
Apr20-11, 01:46 AM   #4335
 
Everything is not totally wasted. Things could be worse, another good sized earthquake could finish off SFP 4 or even cause more junk to fall into it including the other pools. It flood and bleed for now, I don't think corium is traveling freely as the flooding along with nitrogen injection is preventing Unit 1 from freaking out again. 2 & 3 sitting might as well be sitting in a overflowing swimming pools but with such high contamination readings you can't do any meaningful work on any of them until they cool down.

TEPCO seems the most worried about Unit 4's pool so you know where their head is at.

They need to convert a Bobcat simulator(s) to real-time viewing/controls and keep cleaning up using remote operators before attempting the big stuff. If they can keep the contamination mostly localized anything escaping will hopefully just dilute in the air and water. Just don't need any more big event's.

I notice the think tank on this forum is pretty much silent and they are in the industry so they might know more than they are willing to say. Can't blame'em.
New Reply

Tags
japan, nuclear

Similar discussions for: Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants
Thread Forum Replies
8.9 earthquake in Japan: tsunami warnings Current Events 671
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 9
Gen IV Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 10
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 14
Astronomer Predicts Major Earthquake for Japan General Discussion 65