New Reply

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
May8-11, 03:11 AM   #6155
 

Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants


Quote by ranchorelexo View Post
Here is some temps for reactor 3 since the start of the month, not sure what all the different readings are though.

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-...3_05081100.pdf
In above table some RPV temperature is exceeding the design limit of 300oC.

Please could a kind knowledgeable person translate the headings
 
May8-11, 03:23 AM   #6156
 
These two things are moving...??
Attached Thumbnails
vlcsnap-2011-05-08-10h17m46s208.jpg  
 
May8-11, 03:29 AM   #6157
 
Quote by triumph61 View Post
These two things are moving...??
I dunno, but those 40 assemblies at the center of the pic are from the last load IMO. Those are the only ones with visible glowing.

Ps: now we have enough pictures to make a drawing about the pool and make some count about the assemblies- at least we will know how many were not seen.
 
May8-11, 03:37 AM   #6158
 
Quote by triumph61 View Post
These two things are moving...??
Movement due to hot water rising

On the right lower diagonal we see a fuel rack with new fuel. Earlier it was reported that fuel assemblies have plastic cap, I think that is what we are seeing here

 
May8-11, 04:18 AM   #6159
 
Blog Entries: 2
Quote by yakiniku View Post
Apologies about the ambiguity of the translation. As mentioned by rowmag and ernal_student, the mistake that is referred to, I believe is the way in which the information was shared. It does not imply that the information should or should not be revealed.
Thanks to you and the others who commented on it. No apology needed, the misunderstanding was mine.
 
May8-11, 05:53 AM   #6160
 
Quote by Dmytry View Post
Can you see giant number of hydrogen bubbles rising? I can't. Just a few bubbles here and there. Not cubic metres per hour level bubbling.
Careful. Unless I lost some zeroes along the way (all too likely), 1 cubic metre per hour is 278 cubic centimetres per second. That's ONE round bubble about 8 cm across every second (or a number of smaller ones). To put it another way, the average human goes through about half a cubic metre of air an hour.

I'm sure most of what's in those bubbles we see now is steam but... dunno, cubic metres per hour sounds quite as if it were in the realm of the possible, especially if the pool was hotter earlier on (my intuition is more steam means more radiolysis, I bet water self-shields otherwise).
 
May8-11, 05:58 AM   #6161
 
Blog Entries: 2
Quote by zapperzero View Post
Careful. Unless I lost some zeroes along the way (all too likely), 1 cubic metre per hour is 278 cubic centimetres per second. That's ONE round bubble about 8 cm across every second (or a number of smaller ones). To put it another way, the average human goes through about half a cubic metre of air an hour.

I'm sure most of what's in those bubbles we see now is steam but... dunno, cubic metres per hour sounds quite as if it were in the realm of the possible, especially if the pool was hotter earlier on (my intuition is more steam means more radiolysis, I bet water self-shields otherwise).
Also keep in mind that if the pool is full then the tops of the fuel assemblies are about 8 m under water. The gas in each bubble will occupy a larger volume when it gets to the surface. If that rate of bubble generation is constant and continuous and is H2, it's not insignificant.
 
May8-11, 06:12 AM   #6162
 
New video Spent Fuel Pool of Unit 4 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station

YouTube Spent Fuel Pool 4 - 8 May 2011
 
May8-11, 06:14 AM   #6163
 
Video of team working Inside of Reactor Building of Unit 1

YouTube New video of reactor 1 working environment 6 May 2011
 
May8-11, 06:52 AM   #6164
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Rive View Post
<..>
Ps: now we have enough pictures to make a drawing about the pool and make some count about the assemblies- at least we will know how many were not seen.
Yes. We appear to have seen enough fuel racks to hold the recorded number of assemblies in the pool. Here is a rough lineout of the stacking in the pool, as much as can be gleaned from the two released videos.
Attached Thumbnails
P5080106.JPG  
 
May8-11, 06:56 AM   #6165
 
Unit 3 is 314,5C now, this is realy big...
 
May8-11, 07:23 AM   #6166
 
Quote by elektrownik View Post
Unit 3 is 314,5C now, this is realy big...
This morning at 0600 it was 202 C :

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-...0_05080600.pdf

Do you have a link to the source ? I can't find it at the usual locations ...

(and somehow TBS decides to zoom in on unit 1+2 , leaving unit 3 off camera ...)
 
May8-11, 07:41 AM   #6167
 
Quote by GJBRKS View Post
This morning at 0600 it was 202 C :

http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-...0_05080600.pdf

Do you have a link to the source ? I can't find it at the usual locations ...

(and somehow TBS decides to zoom in on unit 1+2 , leaving unit 3 off camera ...)
Just looking at the stats myself

Link:

Stats Unit 3 05/01/11 - 05/08/11
 
May8-11, 07:45 AM   #6168
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by AntonL View Post
In above table some RPV temperature is exceeding the design limit of 300oC.

Please could a kind knowledgeable person translate the headings
Here's what Google Translate gives for the headers, (change in the temperatures over the last week)

1. N4B Water Nozzle Temperature (93.7 --> 202.1 gr.C)
2. RPV bottom head top (122.3 --> 255.6 gr.C)
3. RPV flange body (99.6 --> 310.1 gr.C)
4. Lower temperature pressure vessel (116.5 --> 151.9 gr.C)
5. RPV stud temperature (98.8 --> 253.6 gr.C)
6. RPV flange body Lower temperature (154.6 --> 173.3 gr.C)
7. Relief safety valve 2-71D Leakage (91.3 --> 158.2 gr.C)
8. Relief safety valve 2-71F Leakage (96.9 --> 108.8 gr.C
9. Main steam isolation valve 2-86A Rikuofu (61.2 --> 63 gr.C)
10. D/W HVH return temperature (101.7 --> 157.6 gr.C)
11. Bellows RPV (137.3 --> 208.6 gr.C)
12. S/C Pool A water temperature (40.6 --> 40 gr.C)
13. S/C Pool B water temperature (40.6 --> 40 gr.C)
 
May8-11, 07:56 AM   #6169
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by Jorge Stolfi View Post

I found this photo somewhere several weeks ago. Google found it again at

http://www.japannewstoday.com/wp-con...oolUnit3-1.jpg

By the title, it would seem to be a close-up of the edge of #3's spent-fuel pool, obviously after the explosion, presumably taken by a camera attached to the pump crane. What are those two gray bars at the top left? (They are too smooth and the wrong color to be rebars, and their ends are closed so they do not seem to be conduits.)


I can't see how this motive can be anywhere near the spent fuel pool of unit 3.
It looks more like the edge of a pit or a manhole than a spent fuel pool. For a starter, where's the steel liner?
 
May8-11, 08:17 AM   #6170
 
Quote by Dmytry View Post
[...]
The cooling water is leaking, which means that they are losing boron, and eventually they will run out of boron, at which point cooling could become impossible as non borated cooling water would cause criticality.
The boron in question is not ordinary boron, but enriched boron-10 which is not readily available.
Why should they use enriched B-11? It would be very expensive and scarce. Natural occurring boron contains 20% B-10 with 80% B-11.
Boric acid H3BO3, Borax Na2B2O7 and even Boron trioxide B2O3 are bulk chemicals and very cheap. (I don't think TEPCO needs high grade qualities anymore ...)

An aqueous solution of the above mentioned chemicals can be prepared either on- or off-site. Really no big deal.

Does anybody know which concentration is needed to effectively absorb neutrons with B to avoid criticality?
 
May8-11, 08:32 AM   #6171
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Quote by fluutekies View Post
Why should they use enriched B-11? It would be very expensive and scarce. Natural occurring boron contains 20% B-10 with 80% B-11.
Boric acid H3BO3, Borax Na2B2O7 and even Boron trioxide B2O3 are bulk chemicals and very cheap. (I don't think TEPCO needs high grade qualities anymore ...)

An aqueous solution of the above mentioned chemicals can be prepared either on- or off-site. Really no big deal.

Does anybody know what concentration is needed to effectively absorb neutrons with B to avoid criticality?
From what I've read, boron is used up to a few thousand ppm in the cooling water.
 
New Reply

Tags
japan, nuclear
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Japan Earthquake: nuclear plants
Thread Forum Replies
8.9 earthquake in Japan: tsunami warnings Current Events 671
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 9
Gen IV Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 10
New Nuclear Plants Nuclear Engineering 14
Astronomer Predicts Major Earthquake for Japan General Discussion 65