| Thread Closed |
Less notorious, but still important numbers |
Share Thread |
| Oct16-04, 09:51 PM | #1 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Less notorious, but still important numbers
Everybody knows about pi and e. They are important numbers. They are famous for having the importance they do.
But there are others, such as the golden mean, which are only semi-famous, but have loads of physical significance, perhaps recognized in nature. Other important numbers, which have mathematical significance, which have not received their due recognition, should be belaureled in this thread. The number does not have to be transcendental, but should not be an integer or a simple fraction. Jerry Abbott |
| Oct17-04, 01:20 AM | #2 |
|
|
1>e^pi and pi^e
2>Euler's constant , or gamma 3>Catalan's constant 4>Chaitin's constant 5>Feigenbaum's numbers -- AI |
| Oct17-04, 02:15 AM | #3 |
|
|
Liouville's number proven transcendental in 1850, and the first such decimal fraction number proven transcendental.
[tex]\sum_{n=1...\infty}(10)^{-n!} [/tex] =.110001... |
| Oct17-04, 05:17 PM | #4 |
|
|
Less notorious, but still important numbers |
| Oct23-04, 06:59 PM | #5 |
|
Recognitions:
|
|
| Oct24-04, 04:46 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
| Oct24-04, 10:08 AM | #7 |
|
|
I think 0 is a very important number.
|
| Oct25-04, 04:54 PM | #8 |
|
|
e^(i*pi)+1=0
has e,i,pi,1, and 0 in it. Aaron |
| Nov28-04, 09:19 PM | #9 |
|
|
1. sqrt(2), sqrt(3), sqrt(5)
2. Apery's constant i.e. zeta(3), and zeta(2) 3. Khinchin-Levy constants 4. Madelung's constant (related to 3D NaCl crystal) |
| Jan5-09, 11:24 AM | #10 |
|
Recognitions:
|
42 is in fact the most important number, if you care about such things.
|
| Jan28-09, 09:12 AM | #11 |
|
|
Avogadro's constant 6.0221415 × 1023 mol-1
|
| Jan28-09, 11:42 PM | #12 |
|
|
The fine structure constant alpha = 0.007297351.
|
| May1-09, 10:37 PM | #13 |
|
|
I've been thinking about pi^e lately, and trying to prove that it is irrational. By rewriting e as 1+1+1/2+1/3!+...+1/n! I got it to pi^2*pi^(1/2)*pi^(1/3!)*...*pi^(1/n!), and proved that each of these terms is irrational. I'm stuck when it comes to showing that multiplied together these numbers are irrational. Any ideas?
|
| Thread Closed |
Similar discussions for: Less notorious, but still important numbers
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| complex numbers important | Precalculus Mathematics Homework | 10 | ||
| Notorious Leaders In History... | Current Events | 15 | ||
| the notorious cult of Al-gebra | General Discussion | 7 | ||
| Irrational numbers depends on rational numbers existence | General Math | 0 | ||