Crate Friction on Horizontal Floor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the maximum static friction force for a 35 kg crate on a horizontal floor being pushed with a 110 N force. The correct formula for maximum static friction is f_{s, max} = μ_s N = μ_s mg, where the coefficient of static friction (μ_s) is 0.37. The calculated maximum static friction force is 127 N, but the book rounds this to 130 N due to significant figures, as the values used only contain two significant digits. The participant confirms their method was correct but needed reassurance regarding the rounding convention.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficient
  • Basic knowledge of Newton's second law of motion
  • Ability to perform calculations involving mass and gravitational force
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of static friction and its calculation methods
  • Study Newton's laws of motion for better understanding of forces
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in scientific reporting
  • Explore examples of friction problems in physics textbooks or online resources
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of friction and force calculations.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0
I have a problem with an answer that I don't know how to arrive at.

There is a 35 kg crate on a horizontal floor that a person is pushing with a 110 N force. The coefficient of static friction is 0.37. What is the maximum value f of s, max for which the crate will not move?

I thought that the answer is f of s, max = (coefficient of static frction)(35 kg)(9.8 m / s^2) = 127 N. However, the book lists an answer of 130 N. Am I going about his problem correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're absolutely correct! [tex]f_{s, max} = \mu_s N = \mu_s mg[/tex] Because there are only 2 significant digits in the values for [tex]m, \mu_s[/tex] etc., the answer should be expressed with only 2 significant digits. You got an answer of 127 N which contains 3 significant digits. The book simply rounded up to 130 N to express the answer in 2 significant digits. Wasn't that simple? You were doing everything correctly!
 
Thank you for the reassurance! I don't think I would have gotten any further in the assignment stressing over that one little answer! :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K