| New Reply |
computer chess question -- not a game per se |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Mar22-11, 01:28 PM | #1 |
|
|
computer chess question -- not a game per se
The Mar 21 issue of the New Yorker magazine has a fairly extensive profile of chess whiz kid Magnus Carlsen. In it he makes the claim that he can tell the difference between playing against a computer and a real person, and further he doesn't like playing computers because the games are less interesting. The article also mentions that a computer solved one of his endgames in a way he missed during the match -- hmm, sour grapes or no?
My real questions are: Is it possible to distinguish computer/human play and would this not be a type of Turing Test -- although a rather rarefied one? Does anyone have anecdotal evidence for such? Have there been blind trials of such claims? |
| Apr18-11, 09:58 AM | #2 |
|
|
(e2,e4)
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: computer chess question -- not a game per se
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| How much of a game of luck is chess? | General Discussion | 17 | ||
| How computer plays chess? | Programming & Comp Sci | 3 | ||
| Is a game like chess "solvable"? | General Discussion | 31 | ||
| [SOLVED] Probability of Pairings in Chess Game | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 3 | ||
| X-O game...and chess! | General Math | 5 | ||