New Reply

computer chess question -- not a game per se

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Mar22-11, 01:28 PM   #1
 

computer chess question -- not a game per se


The Mar 21 issue of the New Yorker magazine has a fairly extensive profile of chess whiz kid Magnus Carlsen. In it he makes the claim that he can tell the difference between playing against a computer and a real person, and further he doesn't like playing computers because the games are less interesting. The article also mentions that a computer solved one of his endgames in a way he missed during the match -- hmm, sour grapes or no?

My real questions are: Is it possible to distinguish computer/human play and would this not be a type of Turing Test -- although a rather rarefied one? Does anyone have anecdotal evidence for such? Have there been blind trials of such claims?
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Bird's playlist could signal mental strengths and weaknesses
>> Minus environment, patterns still emerge: Computational study tracks E. coli cells' regulatory mechanisms
>> Bacterium uses natural 'thermometer' to trigger diarrheal disease, scientists find
Apr18-11, 09:58 AM   #2
 
(e2,e4)
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: computer chess question -- not a game per se
Thread Forum Replies
How much of a game of luck is chess? General Discussion 17
How computer plays chess? Programming & Comp Sci 3
Is a game like chess "solvable"? General Discussion 31
[SOLVED] Probability of Pairings in Chess Game Calculus & Beyond Homework 3
X-O game...and chess! General Math 5