# find voltage between two nodes

by builder_user
Tags: nodes, voltage
 P: 196 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data Find voltage between node 1 and node 2 2. Relevant equations What is the algorithm? 3. The attempt at a solution R1=4 Ohms R2=5 Ohms R3=8 Ohms R4=3 Ohms R5=6 Ohms R6=7 Ohms Eэ=20 V E3=17 V E5=15 V Attached Thumbnails
 P: 1,135 use balanced wheat stone bridge thing
 P: 196 Do I need second Kirhgoff rules' equations for every loop?
P: 1,135

## find voltage between two nodes

try "balanced wheat stone bridge"

you wont need Kirhgoff rules

here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge
PF Patron
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 25,457
hi builder_user!
 Quote by builder_user Do I need second Kirhgoff rules' equations for every loop?
(Kirchhoff!)

'fraid so!
 P: 196 What's the next step after Kirchgoff's rules?What do I need to find?I know current in every branch.
 Mentor P: 10,756 You want the voltage between nodes 1 and 2. Use the current you found for the first loop (leftmost) using Kirchhoff to determine the voltage across R1. Then do the obvious voltage sum.
 P: 196 i1=3.7A U=Eэ-i1*R1=5.2V? And the final result -- 20(Eэ)+5.2(U)=25.2V?
 Mentor P: 10,756 That's not the value I get for i1. Better check your derivation. EDIT: My error. Redoing my sums I see that i1 is indeed about 3.7A.
P: 196
 Quote by gneill That's not the value I get for i1. Better check your derivation.
Ok.But what's the next?
Mentor
P: 10,756
 Quote by builder_user Ok.But what's the next?
The next what? Wasn't it the voltage between nodes 1 and 2 that you were looking for?
 P: 196 but i's only I1. Or R1*I1 - is the result?
 Mentor P: 10,756 Very sorry. I see that your figure of 3.7A for i1 and about 5.2V for the voltage between nodes 1 and 2 look okay.
P: 196
 Quote by gneill Very sorry. I see that your figure of 3.7A for i1 and about 5.2V for the voltage between nodes 1 and 2 look okay.
A-a-a-a-a!OMG!I'm already started to do all my work from the beginig...It's about 15 pages A4!
 Mentor P: 10,756 Again, sorry about that. 15 pages of A4? That seems like a lot for just three loops. What method are you using to solve the equations?
P: 196
 Quote by gneill Again, sorry about that. 15 pages of A4? That seems like a lot for just three loops. What method are you using to solve the equations?
It's a big work like coursework.I have 8 exercises need to do with this scheme(different trasformations like triangle-star and different methods of finding currents like method of equivalent generator(I don't know how does it called in English.translate from russian),node voltage method and etc.).And another 7 schemes.One of them is my previous topic's scheme.

I got this result(3.7) by different methods.So if it's wrong - all my work is wrong
 Mentor P: 10,756 I see, so this is just one exercise for the given schematic. It seems to me that a KVL loop approach is the most straight forward for this particular question, since you really only need to solve for the current in the first loop. Have you learned the method to directly write (by inspection) the matrix form of the equations? That allows you solve for the currents using a matrix method (such as Cramer's Rule), which takes only a few lines.
 P: 196 if it's cramer's method... I know this method but I only use it in programming.I solve all equtations in MathCAd.And then I show result without numbers and then the final result.The result without numbers is very big sometimes.

 Related Discussions Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 1 Classical Physics 0 Introductory Physics Homework 6 Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 3 General Physics 17