Charges on Conductors and Gauss's Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net electric field produced by two infinite line charges using Gauss's Law. The first line charge has a linear charge density of 4.8 x 10-6 C/m along the x-axis, while the second line charge, with a linear charge density of -2.4 x 10-6 C/m, is parallel to the x-axis at y=4. The electric field at y=2 is calculated to be 1.022 x 10-3 N/C, while at y=6, it is -0.022 x 10-3 N/C. The calculations utilize the formula E = λ/(2πε0r) and apply Gauss's Law to determine the net electric flux.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and line charge distributions
  • Familiarity with Gauss's Law and its applications
  • Knowledge of the formula for electric field due to line charges: E = λ/(2πε0r)
  • Basic calculus for solving equations involving electric flux
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for different charge configurations
  • Explore the concept of electric flux and its significance in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the effects of varying charge densities on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatics and electric field calculations.

crazynut52
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me a couple hints to get me started on this problem, I am not sure where to go next.

Infinite line of charge has charge per unit unit length 4.8*10^-6 and lies along the x axis. A second uniform line of charge with charge/unit length
-2.4*10^-6 is parallel to the x-axis at y=4. What is the net electric field at y=2 and y=6?

I used the formula E= lamda/2(pi)(epsilon naught)(r) but I am not sure what to put in for r and where to go next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the electric field produced by the individual line charges so all you have to do is add them to find the total field. You just have to remember that the "r" in each expression represents the distance from a point in space to the line charge AND the direction of the field due to each line charge is given by the displacement VECTOR from the point in space to the line charge.

It's worth noting that there is no x-component to any of these vectors.
 


To solve this problem, you can use Gauss's Law, which states that the net electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the enclosed charge divided by the permittivity of free space (epsilon naught). In this case, we can consider a Gaussian surface in the shape of a cylinder with its axis along the x-axis, passing through the point at y=2 and y=6.

For the point at y=2, the Gaussian surface will enclose both the positive and negative charges, therefore the net charge enclosed will be the difference between the two charges: (4.8*10^-6) - (-2.4*10^-6) = 7.2*10^-6.

For the point at y=6, the Gaussian surface will only enclose the negative charge, so the net charge enclosed will be just -2.4*10^-6.

Now, we can use Gauss's Law to calculate the electric field at these points. The electric flux through the Gaussian surface is given by E*A, where A is the surface area of the cylinder. At y=2, the surface area is 2*pi*r, where r is the distance from the x-axis to the cylinder, which is just 2 units. So the electric flux is 2*pi*r*E.

Setting this equal to the net charge enclosed divided by epsilon naught, we get:

2*pi*r*E = (7.2*10^-6)/epsilon naught

Solving for E, we get:

E = (7.2*10^-6)/(2*pi*r*epsilon naught)

Plugging in r=2 and epsilon naught=8.85*10^-12, we get:

E = 1.022*10^-3 N/C

Similarly, at y=6, the electric flux is just pi*r*E, and setting it equal to the net charge enclosed divided by epsilon naught, we get:

pi*r*E = (-2.4*10^-6)/epsilon naught

Solving for E, we get:

E = (-2.4*10^-6)/(pi*r*epsilon naught)

Plugging in r=6 and epsilon naught=8.85*10^-12, we get:

E = -0.022*10^-3 N/C

Therefore, the net electric field at y=
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K