Laplace's Equation and Seperation of Multivariable Differential Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the method of separating multivariable differential equations, specifically in the context of Laplace's Equation in spherical coordinates. The solution is expressed as a product of two functions: u(r, θ) = R(r)·Θ(θ). By substituting this form into the differential equation, it can be rearranged into a format where each side is independent of the other variable, leading to two separate differential equations. The process concludes with the application of the Cauchy-Euler method to solve the resulting equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable differential equations
  • Familiarity with Laplace's Equation
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates
  • Experience with the Cauchy-Euler method
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in differential equations
  • Learn about Laplace's Equation in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the Cauchy-Euler differential equation and its applications
  • Investigate the uniqueness of solutions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with multivariable differential equations, particularly in the context of electromagnetic theory and potential theory.

dduardo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
3
Can someone explain how to separate a multivariable differential equation into two independent differential equations? I'm having an issue solving for the potential in spherical co-ordinates in terms of r and theta.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say you have a differential equation that involves both [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex]. The way separation of variables works is that you assume that the solution can be written as a product of two functions: one function that is ONLY a function of [tex]r[/tex] and another function that is ONLY a function of [tex]\theta[/tex]. Thus, you guess the solution

[tex]u(r, \theta) = R(r)\cdot \Theta(\theta)[/tex]

You then insert this into your differential equation. Derivatives with respect to [tex]r[/tex] will only affect the [tex]R(r)[/tex] function (the [tex]\Theta(\theta)[/tex] is not affected) and vice versa with derivatives with respect to [tex]\theta[/tex].

After you have determined how your differential equation looks when you have inserted this solution, you can rearrange the differential equation so that it looks something like

[tex]F(R''(r), R'(r), r) = G(\Theta''(\theta), \Theta'(\theta), \theta)[/tex] (1)

Here I have assumed that your differential equation was second order in both [tex]r[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex]. To put it in this form usually requires dividing both sides of the equation by [tex]R(r)\cdot \Theta(\theta)[/tex] but it can also involves other kinds of multiplications as well. The whole point of writing as I did in (1) is so you have one side of the differential equation that is completely independent of [tex]\theta[/tex] and the other side that is completely independent of [tex]r[/tex].

When this is true, the only possibility is that each side of the differential equation is equal to constant. This is true because the ONLY function of say [tex]\theta[/tex] that does not depend on [tex]\theta[/tex] is a constant.

At this point you are done...you now have the following:

[tex]F(R''(r), R'(r), r) = constant = G(\Theta''(\theta), \Theta'(\theta), \theta)[/tex]

So you have TWO differential equations of a single variable. In this process however you must realize that separation of variables only works in some cases and in the cases where it does work you must ask the question "Is this solution unique?" But for the problems you are doing in E&M you probably don't have to worry about this.
 
Thanks for the help. After I got both differential equations I was able to apply cauchy-euler to solve them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K