Prove that the lim (x->1) x^2 + 2 is NOT equal to 2.999?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bezgin
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the limit of the function \( f(x) = x^2 + 2 \) as \( x \) approaches 1, specifically addressing whether this limit can be equal to 2.999. Participants explore the implications of limits, the role of constants in limits, and the formal definition of limits using epsilon-delta arguments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to prove that the limit is not equal to 2.999 and seeks clarification on the epsilon-delta relationship.
  • Another participant asserts that the limit of \( x^2 \) approaches 1, implying that the constant 2 does not affect the limit.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the limit approaching from the left could yield 2.999, while approaching from the right could yield 3.00001, indicating the need to specify the direction of approach.
  • One participant explains the formal definition of limits and argues that while it is possible to choose a delta for 3, it does not hold for 2.999, suggesting that 2.999 cannot be the limit.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the concept of "closeness" in limits and seeks to understand the epsilon-delta relationship better.
  • A later reply provides a detailed epsilon-delta argument to show that 2.9991 cannot be the limit, outlining cases for \( x > 1 \) and \( x < 1 \) and demonstrating that the conditions cannot be satisfied for 2.9991.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the limit can equal 2.999, with some arguing against it based on the formal definition of limits, while others highlight the importance of the direction of approach. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the formal definition of limits and the epsilon-delta framework, but there are indications of confusion regarding the application of these concepts. The discussion also highlights the potential for different limit values based on the direction of approach.

bezgin
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
How can we prove that the lim (x->1) x^2 + 2 is NOT equal to 2.999? (example I made up right now) At the end of each proof we find a relation between epsilon and delta. What does it mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't take back the 2 as a constant, and the limit of x² will be 1
 
Since
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 1}x^2+2=2.999 \iff \lim_{x\rightarrow 1}x^2=0.999[/tex]
we can work with the righthanded expression. (it's easier).
We'll have to find an [itex]\epsilon>0[/itex] such that for any [itex]\delta>0[/itex] we have [itex]|x-1|<\delta[/itex] AND [itex]|x^2-0.999|>\epsilon[/itex]

EDIT: Removed 'proof', because of errors.
 
Last edited:
my friend it's real simple; as the 2 won't be effected by the limit, so only part affected by limit is x^2 when x->1

although u are write it might go to 2.999 when it approach from left, but u need to consider another fact when limit approach from right than it will be 3.00001 that's how we prove that because u don't specify as limit apporaches from right or left
 
Proving that [tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) = b[/tex] means that it should be possible, by choosing a [tex]\delta[/tex] , to make the make the difference in values of f(x) and b smaller than any positive number [tex]\epsilon[/tex], for all the values of [tex]|x-a|[/tex] less than [tex]\delta[/tex].

For 3, you can show this to be true. But for 2.999, although you can choose a number for which the difference is smaller than any positive number, but this will not be true for all the [tex]|x-a|[/tex] smaller than that chosen number.

That is the reason why 2.999 isn't the limit of the function.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
These replies make think, once again, what does it mean to be "close"?
Can't we find a relation between epsilon and delta by doing the operations abs(x^2 + 2 - 2.999) < epsilon and abs(x-1) < delta?
I'm really stuck with this issue for two weeks and think I will not understand the concept of the formal definition of a limit. I've tried nearly anything on the web :(
 
Sure, here's how:
[tex]|x^{2}+2-2.9991|=|(x-1)(x+1)+r|,r=0.0009[/tex]
1) Assume x>1:
Then r+(x-1)(x+1)>r>0, so:
[tex]|(x-1)(x+1)+r|>r[/tex].
Choose in this case, [tex]\epsilon<r[/tex]
2)Assume x<1.
Then, you can find [tex]\delta[/tex], so that [tex](1-x)(x+1)<\frac{r}{2}[/tex]
Hence, by the triangle inequality, we have:
[tex]|x^{2}+2-2.9991|=|(x-1)(x+1)+r|\geq(r-(1-x)(x+1))\geq(r-\frac{r}{2})=\frac{r}{2}[/tex]

Hence, the choice [tex]\epsilon<\frac{r}{2}[/tex] is always out of reach, so 2.9991 cannot be the limit.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K