Register to reply

Hollow rectangular beam - rigidity and max torque.

by 10^-3
Tags: beam, hollow, rectangular, rigidity, torque
Share this thread:
10^-3
#1
Apr21-11, 01:04 PM
P: 8
Revision that is turning into a learning from scratch session. Some help would be welcome! (I have laso put this on the materials section of engineering).

- I have a hollow rectangular beam. 0.150m by 0.110m with uniform thickness walls at 0.003m. It is 3m long.
- It has a modulus of rigidity (G) of 27 GigaPascals.
- It has a max permitted shear stress of 200 MegaPascals.

What is the torsional rigidity?
What is max permitted torque (with a safety margin of 2.0)?
What would be the twist angle for the 3m length?

Torsional rigidity = G x second area of inertia. I have G so need 1xx.
1xx =
Each side at ((0.003x0.110^3)/12) = 3.33 E-07
Top & base each at (using parallel axis theory) ((0.003 x 0.144^3)/12) + (0.003 x 0.144 x 0.062^2) = 2.41 E-06
Add 4 sides = 5.48 E-06

Torsional rigidity = 27 E09 x 5.48 E-06 = 148,000 (units???)

Is this right and what are the units?

As for the other 2 parts I am lost. Any pointers?
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
'Smart material' chin strap harvests energy from chewing
King Richard III died painfully on battlefield
Capturing ancient Maya sites from both a rat's and a 'bat's eye view'
Phrak
#2
Apr21-11, 01:11 PM
P: 4,512
As for your last two questions, they are related. Is there a constraint other than structural failing, such as the yield strength that determines the max allowable twist angle? Euler buckling of the walls is also a possibility.
10^-3
#3
Apr21-11, 01:16 PM
P: 8
Phrak - thanks for replying. There are no other contraints in this question.

Phrak
#4
Apr21-11, 01:25 PM
P: 4,512
Hollow rectangular beam - rigidity and max torque.

Well, that's it then. Find the twist angle that hit's 200 MegaPascals stress for any given element. This is one possible limit. The other limit is determined by buckling, dependent upon the modulus of rigidity.
10^-3
#5
Apr21-11, 02:09 PM
P: 8
Phrak, Thanks. What equation would I use to find the twist angle that uses the information that I already have?
I think it may be twist angle = (torque x length) / (torsional rigidity). I have torsional rigidity (above - if it is correct?) and I have length (3m) but I am not sure about torque and how would I apply a safety factor of 2.0? I know I need to use the max permitted shear stress of 200MegaPascal but I am not sure how. Thanks.
Phrak
#6
Apr21-11, 03:58 PM
P: 4,512
Well, I haven't seen your equations. I'm familiar with circular cross sections, where the stress is simple to calculate--it's pure compression and tension cotangent with a helical curve running at 45 degree around the axis. What do your stresses look like with a rectangular cross section?
10^-3
#7
Apr21-11, 04:16 PM
P: 8
The approach to the question is supposed to be very basic in order to help us with revision (it needs to be for my level of understanding) so I doubt it will get into 3-d .
I think that to get the twist angle I need torque (as above) but to get torque I need Torque = 2 x area x shear flow(q).......... but to get the shear flow ..... i need Torque... I am not sure how to get out of that circle with what I have got.
SteamKing
#8
Apr21-11, 06:00 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,729
I don't know all the details behind this assignment, but the torsional stress analysis of hollow, non-circular cross sections is completely different from analyzing circular shafts.
For instance, given the dimensions of your cross section and the thickness of the sides, this beam could be treated as a thin-walled beam. A torque applied to the beam sets up shear stresses in the walls, such that tau = T / (2At), where T = torque, t = wall thickness, and A = total area enclosed by the mid line of the sides [including the hollow portion]. For a complete description of the details, you must consult special texts on advanced strength of materials.
Phrak
#9
Apr22-11, 03:53 AM
P: 4,512
Quote Quote by 10^-3 View Post
The approach to the question is supposed to be very basic in order to help us with revision (it needs to be for my level of understanding) so I doubt it will get into 3-d .
I think that to get the twist angle I need torque (as above) but to get torque I need Torque = 2 x area x shear flow(q).......... but to get the shear flow ..... i need Torque... I am not sure how to get out of that circle with what I have got.
Go back to first principles. You have a thin walled rectangular tube so the shear stress on an inside element is about the same as an opposing outside element. Draw a rectangle centered about the origin. Draw another rectangle displaced by some angle Δθ. These are two successive cross sections one unit separated along the length of the tube. Δθ will give you the sheer displacements and so the shear. Given the elastic modulus, the dimensions, and a little integration, you can calculate all the rest.


--but I'm still betting on Euler buckling before material failure.
10^-3
#10
Apr22-11, 04:46 AM
P: 8
Phrak and Steam King - thanks. Whilst it would be interesting to see if Eular Buckling occurred sooner than material failure I am confident that I am expected to find the material failure figures.

This brings me to Steam King's equation "tau = T / (2At), where T = torque, t = wall thickness, and A = total area enclosed by the mid line of the sides [including the hollow portion]". Does this mean that the tau is the maximum permissible shear stress (the 200MegaPascals that I have been given) and that I can get torque by rearranging the equation to be T= tau x (2At). This will give me torque to enter into the equation twist angle = (torque x length) / (torsional rigidity).

The numbers should work out to be:
Torque = 200E6 (tau) x 2 x 0.147x0.107 (enclosed area) x 0.003 (wall thickness) = 18,800 (units ?Nm?)

However I am supposed to have a 2.0 safety factor so I divide this by 2 = 9,400

I can then use this to work out the twist angle.
Twist angle = (9,400 (torque) x 3 (length)) / 148,000 (torsional rigidity) = .19 (is this radians? If it is then this would be 11 degrees. I think I may have gone wrong somewhere? Any suggestions?
SteamKing
#11
Apr22-11, 11:00 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,729
The J calculation for thin-walled closed non-circular sections is not related to finding the usual second moments of area typically encountered in bending stress calculations.

For a closed thin-walled non-circular section, J = 4tA^2/S, where t = thickness [constant thru-out the section], A is the cross sectional area [same area used to determine tau], and S is the total perimeter length around the cross section at the mid line of the sides.

The angle of twist, phi = tau * S / (2*A*G), where tau, S, and A are defined as above. G is the modulus of rigidity. These relations work only for non-circular sections having constant thickness. For more general sections, you must consult advance strength of materials texts.
10^-3
#12
Apr22-11, 11:36 AM
P: 8
Steam King, thanks.
1. So I should not have used second moment of inertia or indeed parallel axis theorem because they do not apply to torques only to bending moments.
2. I should have used torsional rigidity = GJ. I have G so all I need to do is to calculate J by using your equation. In this case: 4 x 0.003 (wall thickness) x (0.147x0.107)^2 (enclosed area) / 0.496 (the perimeter). So J = 5.99E-6. Torsional rigidity = 5.99E-6 x 27E9 = 161730 (units?)
3. For the angle of twist I use phi = 200E6 (tau) x 0.496 (the perimeter) / 2 x (0.147x0.107) (enclosed area) x 27E09 (G) = 0.117 radians or 6.69degrees.
Am I now in the right ball park? Again – thanks.
pongo38
#13
Apr22-11, 04:07 PM
P: 699
You could check that J = Ix + Iy
SteamKing
#14
Apr22-11, 06:56 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 6,729
Except that J = Ix + Iy only for circular cross sections.
nvn
#15
Apr24-11, 04:09 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,124
Very well said by SteamKing. Only one minor mistake. You need to multiply the numerator of the phi equation by L.

10^-3: Regarding your questions in post 12: (1) No, second moment of area applies also to torsion, for closed, circular cross sections, as foreshadowed by SteamKing. (2 and 3) Your perimeter, s, is slightly incorrect. See the definition by SteamKing for parameter s, and try again on items 2 and 3. Regarding units, you can figure out units yourself by including units in your arithmetic and algebra. Try again. Also, to include the safety factor, divide maximum permitted shear stress by the safety factor.

By the way, always leave a space between a numeric value and its following unit symbol. E.g., 0.150 m, not 0.150m. See the international standard for writing units (ISO 31-0). Also, torque is N*m, not Nm. And the correct spelling is megapascal (MPa), gigapascal (GPa), newton (N).
10^-3
#16
Apr28-11, 04:08 PM
P: 8
Steam King and nvk. Many thanks. It really is appreciated. Third time lucky! Here we go….

1. I calculate torsional rigidity = GJ.
2. J = 4tA^2/S. 4 x 0.003 (wall thickness) x (0.147x0.107)^2 (enclosed area) / 0.508 (the perimeter .147+.147+.107+.107). So J = 5.84E-6 m^4 (correct units?).
3. Torsional rigidity = GJ = 5.84E-6 x 27E9 = 157,791 n*m^2 (correct units?).
4. Max shear stress (200 Mpa) / safety factor (2) = 100 MPa.
5. Max permitted torque with a safety factor: = 100E6 (tau) x 2 x 0.147x0.107 (enclosed area) x 0.003 (wall thickness) = 9,437 N*m.
6. For the angle of twist I use: twist angle = (torque x length) / (torsional rigidity). = [9437 N*m (max permitted torque) * 3 m (length)] / 157,791 n*m^2 (torsional rigidity) = 0.18 radians or 10.28 degrees.

Concerns:
A, Should I be using second moment of inertia? GJ or GIxx? I get J to be 5.84E-6 m^4 and Ixx to be 5.48 E-06 m^4. They are pretty close but which one is correct?
B. I have worked through all of my calculations using the units and have ended up with those shown above. Have I now got this right? Nvk – thanks for your tips and I agree that precision is important.
C. I have 2 ways to calculate the angle of twist: twist angle = (torque x length) / (torsional rigidity) (giving 0.18 radians) and phi = 100 E6 (tau) x 0.508 (the perimeter) / 2 x (0.147x0.107) (enclosed area) x 27E09 (G) = 0.059 radians (I presume that this would be per metre so I need * 3m to get 0.18 radians). It is good news that they agree, however, which is the more appropriate method or are they in fact identical and I cannot see it?

Once again - THANK YOU!
nvn
#17
Apr28-11, 09:54 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
P: 2,124
10^-3: All your answers appear correct, except you misspelled some unit symbols. Always use the correct capitalization of unit symbols. E.g., N*m, not n*m. And MPa, not Mpa. Also, numbers less than 1 must always have a zero before the decimal point. E.g., 0.147, not .147. See the links I posted.

You should use J, not Ixx. Therefore, you used the correct value for J. Generally always maintain at least four significant digits throughout all your intermediate calculations, then round only the final answer to three (or four) significant digits.

You can use either twist angle formula you prefer. I prefer your second formula.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Hollow rectangular Beam - rigidity and max torque Materials & Chemical Engineering 0
Hollow circular tube versus hollow rectangular shaft General Physics 3
Predicted deflection of a rectangular steel beam Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 8
Torsion in hollow rectangular steel tube Mechanical Engineering 9
Diffraction: rectangular aperture and gaussian beam Classical Physics 0