Why Doesn't the Object Fall in a Centripetal Force Experiment?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of centripetal force in an experiment involving a rubber bung attached to a string. Participants explore why the bung does not fall despite the gravitational force acting on it, examining the roles of tension and centripetal force in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why the gravitational force (Mg) does not cause the bung to fall, despite the centripetal force (tension) acting towards the center.
  • Another participant suggests that the tension force has an upward component that balances the downward gravitational force, leading to the equation Tcos(θ) - mg = 0.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between tension and gravitational force, with one participant proposing that T = mg/cos(θ) for balance in the vertical direction.
  • Participants explore the implications of changing the angle of deflection and how it affects the forces involved, including the tension and friction between the string and the glass rod.
  • One participant questions the source of the tension force, leading to clarification that it arises from the stretching of the string rather than from gravity.
  • Another participant discusses how increased speed in the system can lead to greater normal force and thus increased friction, despite the contact area remaining the same.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the role of tension in balancing gravitational force, but there are varying interpretations regarding the implications of angle deflection and the source of tension. The discussion remains unresolved on some aspects, particularly regarding the relationship between tension and friction.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the exact mechanics of the forces involved, particularly in relation to the angle of deflection and the resulting effects on tension and friction. There are also unresolved mathematical steps in the derivation of force relationships.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators interested in understanding the dynamics of centripetal force, tension, and gravitational interactions in experimental physics contexts.

adrienne
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
sth about centripetal force. pls help! ><

i got some problem about centripetal force. in this experiment, " http://www.smcc.edu.hk/phy/Experiments.files/Centripetal%20Force.doc "
my hand apply a horizontal force, to give the velocity 'ω' to the stopper thing. when i decompose ω into vectors, i got a centripetal force to the centre. but then the problem comes. i don't undrstand y Mg doesn't fall down. as the centripetal force (Tension) has a direction to centre and Mg is pointing downwards, y don't it fall?

is that becoz when there is a 'ω', there will be a centripetal force(T) with a magnitude, which hv a length 'r' (radius)? so when the bung is whirled, there will be a length 'r', which make Mg remain at the same level?

but then there'll be another problem... if Mg doesn't fall, according to Newton's 3rd law, there is another upward force. is that real?

i'm just thinking when the force applied is small, the deflected angle of the bung is large. is it becoz the centripetal force is small? if it is, the vertical component of the bung is then smaller! how can it keep 'mg' at the same level then?

pls help! ><
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, adrienne!
Now, would you agree that the tension force from the string acts parallell to the string?
 
isn't tension acts along the string??
 
True, that's what I meant!
The string was never EXACTLY horizontally aligned, was it?
 
yes. but is there a chance for the string to move up instead of slightly deflected?
 
If you start accelerating the system from an equilibrium state, so that the angular velocity increases, then you'll see that the string (and the stopper) moves upwards in the sense of becoming "more" horizontal.
Was that your question?
 
why can't i make it more horizontal if i tried to keep L constant throughout the experiment ?? when I'm doing this 'experiment', the deflection is too large that the bung hit my head!
 
Hmm..I'm a bit unsure about the last comment, but I'll answer your question "why doesn't it fall down?"

Since we agree that the string is NOT exactly horizontal, the tension force has an UPWARDS component (opposite the direction of gravity!).
Now, if the angle between the rod and the taut string is [tex]\theta[/tex], we let "T" be the magnitude of the tension force, (Or simply the tension in the string).
Can you agree that the requirement that the rubber bung does NOT fall down must be:
[tex]T\cos\theta-mg=0[/tex]
(m is the mass of the rubber bung)
The equation is simply Newton's 2.law in the vertical with the requirement of no vertical acceleration.
 
yes i understand the equation. how can we make the forces be balanced??
 
  • #10
You see that the given equation implies that balance in the VERTICAL, requires that the magnitude of the tension force must satisfy:
[tex]T=\frac{mg}{\cos\theta}[/tex]
Agreed?
 
  • #11
what is the meaning of this equation??
 
  • #12
The meaning of this equation is that the MAGNITUDE of the tension force nust satisfy this relation, in order for us to have balance of forces in the VERTICAL.
 
  • #13
oh i see. : )
just now i realized the centripetal force is from Mg and Mg=T...
so the relation between M and m is M=m/cosθ ??
 
  • #14
With "m" I meant the mass, which you denoted by "M"
(Sorry about that, my fault..:redface:)

Now let us talk about the CENTRIPETAL force!
Since you move the bung in a HORIZONTAL circle, the CENTRIPETAL ACCELERATION must lie in the HORIZONTAL plane, and the CENTRIPETAL FORCE must be in the horizontal as well.

Hence, the centripetal force is nothing but THE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT OF THE TENSION FORCE.
The tension force itself has TWO components:
1)The vertical component: This balances gravity so the bung doesn't fall down.
2)The horizontal component: This is simply the centripetal force which makes the bung travel in a CIRCLE

Did you get that?
 
  • #15
oh...
one more question: where is the tension force comes from? if it comes from Mg, why can it balance the gravity?
 
  • #16
It does NOT "come from" Mg (that's gravity), it comes from that your string stretches out a bit; the constituent molecules in the string opposes that stretch, and tries as best as they can to keep the length as close to the equilibrium length as possible.

Think of the string as a minuscule chain if you like; you can coil and bend a chain quite a lot, but what you won't be able to do is to lengthen it..
 
  • #17
then i see. i should mind the wordings, right? : )
i heard sb sayin' if the angle of deflection is high, the friction between the glass rod and string will increase. but the contact surface area is the same! how can we explain that??
 
  • #18
1)Now consider a box of mass M standing on the floor.
A NORMAL FORCE of value Mg works upwards to keep the books from falling through, right?
2)Now, put another box of mass M on top the other; clearly the normal force is now 2Mg; but the contact area between the floor and the box hasn't appreciably increased, has it?
(On a tiny, microscopic scale, that which corresponds to surface area will probably have increased somewhat, but macroscopically, we won't notice that)
3) To the question:
When the system whirls extremely fast, the string is pushed more strongly against the glass surface.
Hence, the NORMAL FORCE from the glass on the string increases.
Since it often is true that the FRICTION is proportional to the normal force, the frictional force increases as well..
 
  • #19
I have to retract 3) a bit:
Assume that the lower mass is at rest.
Then the tension in the rope segment attached to it must be:
[tex]T_{low}=m_{low}g[/tex]
Where [tex]T_{low}[/tex] is the tension is the lower, free-hanging end of the string, whereas [tex]m_{low}[/tex] is the mass of the object dangling from it.
Consider now the rope segment inside the glass rod.
At the top, we know that the tension is what is needed to whirl the system around, that is:
[tex]T_{up}=\frac{Mg}{\cos\theta}[/tex]
A STATIC friction F (from the glass rod) must keep this rope segment at rest in the vertical direction; hence:
[tex]T_{up}-T_{low}-F=0[/tex]
Or:
[tex]F=\frac{Mg}{\cos\theta}-m_{low}g[/tex]
From this expression, we see that F increases with the angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
18K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K